Peter Slezák
-
- Philosophy and History of Science 16
- Pathology and Forensic Medicine top 10%
- Genetic factors in colorectal cancer 7
- Gastroenterology top 10%
- General Psychology top 10%
- Philosophy top 2%
- Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics 8
-
- Philosophy and Theoretical Science 11
-
- Gastric Cancer Management and Outcomes 10
-
- Esophageal Cancer Research and Treatment 9
-
- Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection 8
-
- Microscopic Colitis 7
Peter Slezák
116 papers receiving 1.4k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 164
- History and Philosophy of Science 135
- Pathology and Forensic Medicine 200
- Gastroenterology 58
- General Psychology 13
- Philosophy 114
Countries citing papers authored by Peter Slezák
This map shows the geographic impact of Peter Slezák's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Peter Slezák with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Peter Slezák more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Peter Slezák
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Peter Slezák. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Peter Slezák. The network helps show where Peter Slezák may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Peter Slezák, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2016 | 6 | |
| 2 | 2016 | 11 | |
| 3 | 2015 | 26 | |
| 4 | 2014 | 18 | |
| 5 | 2014 | 32 | |
| 6 | 2013 | 6 | |
| 7 | 2012 | 31 | |
| 8 | 2011 | 39 | |
| 9 | 2010 | 11 | |
| 10 | 2010 | 9 | |
| 11 | Cartesian 'Ideas' and the First Cognitive Revolution | 2006 | 0 |
| 12 | Developmental Shifts in Children's Categorizations of the Earth | 2005 | 16 |
| 13 | Fodor’s ‘Guilty Passions’: Representation as Hume’s Ideas | 2004 | 0 |
| 14 | Representation in mind : new approaches to mental representation | 2004 | 62 |
| 15 | A Critique of Radical Social Constructivism | 2000 | 15 |
| 16 | 1999 | 50 | |
| 17 | Perspectives on cognitive science : theories, experiments and foundations | 1995 | 17 |
| 18 | 1991 | 16 | |
| 19 | Computers, brains, and minds : essays in cognitive science | 1989 | 4 |
| 20 | 1988 | 4 |
About Peter Slezák
Peter Slezák is a scholar working on History and Philosophy of Science, General Psychology, Philosophy, Gastroenterology and Microbiology, having authored 122 papers that have together received 1.5k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Philosophy and History of Science (16 papers), Philosophy and Theoretical Science (11 papers), Gastric Cancer Management and Outcomes (10 papers), Esophageal Cancer Research and Treatment (9 papers), Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics (8 papers), Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection (8 papers), Genetic factors in colorectal cancer (7 papers) and Microscopic Colitis (7 papers). The work is most often cited by research in History and Philosophy of Science (135 citations), Pathology and Forensic Medicine (200 citations), Gastroenterology (58 citations), General Psychology (13 citations) and Philosophy (114 citations). Peter Slezák has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, Sweden and Slovakia. Frequent co-authors include Carlos Rubio-Terrés, Myles Brand, Edgar Jaramillo, Iveta Waczulı́ková, Peter Bališ, Angelika Púzserová, Iveta Bernátová, C. Hammarberg, U Öhman and C. Johansson. Their work appears in journals such as Science & Education, Social Studies of Science, Physiological Research, Diseases of the Colon & Rectum and The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.