Peter Schmidt

78 papers receiving 530 citations

Peers

Peter Schmidt
Comparison fields: 5 of 136
  • General Economics, Econometrics and Finance 99
  • Economics and Econometrics 193
  • Statistics and Probability 55
  • Literature and Literary Theory 67
  • Finance 61
Replace Klaus Zimmermann with:
Klaus Zimmermann Germany
David M. Robinson United States
Daniel R. Headrick United States
Russell R. Menard United States
Paul M. Kellstedt United States
Geoffrey Hawthorn United Kingdom
Donald Alexander Mackenzie United Kingdom
Hayward R. Alker United States
John Markoff United States
Paul Ormerod United Kingdom
Peter Schmidt relative to Klaus Zimmermann Germany Klaus Zimmermann's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.0×
Klaus Zimmermann · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Peter Schmidt

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Peter Schmidt's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Peter Schmidt with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Peter Schmidt more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Peter Schmidt

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Peter Schmidt. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Peter Schmidt. The network helps show where Peter Schmidt may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Peter Schmidt, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Peter Schmidt Line = papers co-authored together Peter Schmidt links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 107 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1978101
2 200372
3 197460
4 197347
5 199544
6 199528
7 200223
8 197322
9 201218
10 197718
11 198918
12 199216
13 198915
14 201814
15 201113
16 199313
17 198913
18 196811
19
Sitting in Darkness: New South Fiction, Education, and the Rise of Jim Crow Colonialism, 1865-1920
200810
20 199710

About Peter Schmidt

Peter Schmidt is a scholar working on Political Science and International Relations, Literature and Literary Theory, Economics and Econometrics, Sociology and Political Science and Global and Planetary Change, having authored 107 papers that have together received 762 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include American Constitutional Law and Politics (8 papers), American and British Literature Analysis (6 papers), Botany and Plant Ecology Studies (6 papers), Poetry Analysis and Criticism (5 papers), Ecology, Conservation, and Geographical Studies (5 papers), Advanced Statistical Methods and Models (4 papers), Forest Ecology and Biodiversity Studies (4 papers) and Species Distribution and Climate Change (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in General Economics, Econometrics and Finance (99 citations), Economics and Econometrics (193 citations), Statistics and Probability (55 citations), Literature and Literary Theory (67 citations) and Finance (61 citations). Peter Schmidt has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, United States and Switzerland. Frequent co-authors include Kajal Lahiri, Amritjit Singh, David K. Guilkey, Scott R. Eliason, Wolfgang Karl Härdle, Matthias R. Fengler, Pamela R. Willoughby, Timothy S. Schoenecker, Edward N. Muller and Anthony Patt. Their work appears in journals such as Econometrica, European Journal of Forest Research, American Literature, ˜The œMississippi quarterly and Acta Arithmetica.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact