Peter Santer

1.8k citations
42 papers · 1.1k · h-index 18

Impact in

Papers in

Peter Santer

41 papers receiving 1.1k citations

Peers

Peter Santer
Comparison fields: 5 of 103
  • Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine 310
  • Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine 210
  • Developmental Neuroscience 96
  • Physiology 349
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 208
Replace Piotr K. Janicki with:
Piotr K. Janicki United States
Marina L. H. Honing Netherlands
Kwok Fu Jacobus Ng Hong Kong
Steven Ramael United States
C. Philip Larson United States
Chris Garratt United Kingdom
Guoquan Xu United States
Manfred Zehetgruber Austria
Seonghoon Ko South Korea
Chikara Tashiro Japan
Peter Santer relative to Piotr K. Janicki United States Piotr K. Janicki's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5.7×
Piotr K. Janicki · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Peter Santer

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Peter Santer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Peter Santer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Peter Santer more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Peter Santer

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Peter Santer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Peter Santer. The network helps show where Peter Santer may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Peter Santer, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Peter Santer Line = papers co-authored together Peter Santer links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 42 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2017302
2 201495
3 202184
4 202258
5 202143
6 202039
7 201936
8 202029
9 202125
10 201725
11 202024
12 202023
13 202123
14 201423
15 202022
16 202321
17 202219
18 202019
19 202017
20 202115

About Peter Santer

Peter Santer is a scholar working on Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine and Surgery, having authored 42 papers that have together received 1.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Respiratory Support and Mechanisms (15 papers), Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes (14 papers), Intensive Care Unit Cognitive Disorders (13 papers), Anesthesia and Sedative Agents (12 papers), Airway Management and Intubation Techniques (7 papers), Cardiac Arrest and Resuscitation (4 papers), Anesthesia and Pain Management (3 papers) and Neuroscience of respiration and sleep (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine (310 citations), Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine (210 citations), Developmental Neuroscience (96 citations), Physiology (349 citations) and Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (208 citations). Peter Santer has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Germany and Thailand. Frequent co-authors include Matthias Eikermann, Luca J. Wachtendorf, Maximilian S. Schaefer, Jack J. Miller, Snapper R. M. Magor‐Elliott, Olivia K. Faull, Brianna J. Stubbs, Kieran Clarke, Pete J. Cox and Matthew Stirling. Their work appears in journals such as British Journal of Anaesthesia, Anesthesiology, Journal of Clinical Anesthesia, Anesthesia & Analgesia and Anaesthesia.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact