Peter Roessingh

2.2k citations
55 papers · 1.6k · h-index 24

Impact in

Papers in

Peter Roessingh

54 papers receiving 1.5k citations

Peers

Peter Roessingh
Comparison fields: 5 of 90
  • Insect Science 578
  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 844
  • Genetics 664
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 411
  • Developmental Biology 35
Replace Carole M. Smadja with:
Carole M. Smadja France
Douglas W. Whitman United States
Luc F. Bussière United Kingdom
W. Scharloo Netherlands
Christine R. B. Boake United States
Philip T. Starks United States
Donald K. Price United States
Tom Reader United Kingdom
Anne Lyytinen Finland
Ralph V. Cartar Canada
Peter Roessingh relative to Carole M. Smadja France Carole M. Smadja's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.6×
Carole M. Smadja · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Peter Roessingh

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Peter Roessingh's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Peter Roessingh with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Peter Roessingh more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Peter Roessingh

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Peter Roessingh. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Peter Roessingh. The network helps show where Peter Roessingh may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Peter Roessingh, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Peter Roessingh Line = papers co-authored together Peter Roessingh links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 55 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1993140
2 199889
3 199488
4 199888
5 199283
6 198780
7 199474
8 199468
9 199663
10 199560
11 199058
12 199746
13 201745
14 199844
15 198641
16 199140
17 202138
18 200537
19 199935
20 201531

About Peter Roessingh

Peter Roessingh is a scholar working on Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Genetics, Insect Science, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience and Plant Science, having authored 55 papers that have together received 1.6k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Plant and animal studies (27 papers), Insect and Arachnid Ecology and Behavior (20 papers), Insect-Plant Interactions and Control (10 papers), Neurobiology and Insect Physiology Research (10 papers), Insect and Pesticide Research (9 papers), Animal Behavior and Reproduction (8 papers), Primate Behavior and Ecology (6 papers) and Insect Pheromone Research and Control (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Insect Science (578 citations), Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (844 citations), Genetics (664 citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (411 citations) and Developmental Biology (35 citations). Peter Roessingh has collaborated with scholars based in Netherlands, United Kingdom and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Stephen J. Simpson, Erich Städler, Steph B. J. Menken, Alan R. McCaffery, Samantha James, M. Saiful Islam, J. Hurter, M. Saiful Islam, J.W. Klijnstra and P.R. Wiepkema. Their work appears in journals such as Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata, Physiological Entomology, Folia Primatologica, Journal of Chemical Ecology and Proceedings of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact