Peter Redmond

495 citations
19 papers · 362 indexed · h-index 10

Impact in

Papers in

Peter Redmond

18 papers receiving 331 citations

Peers

Peter Redmond
Comparison fields: 5 of 52
  • Nuclear and High Energy Physics 148
  • Statistical and Nonlinear Physics 71
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 175
  • Mathematical Physics 20
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics 36
Replace Mark D. Semon with:
Mark D. Semon United States
Sadataka Furui Japan
Lewis P. Fulcher United States
G. Wunner Germany
J. E. Solomin Argentina
Tomasz Dobrowolski Poland
Michel Vittot France
Y. Srivastava United States
W. V. Houston United States
M. Lewkowicz Israel
Peter Redmond relative to Mark D. Semon United States Mark D. Semon's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Mark D. Semon · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Peter Redmond

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Peter Redmond's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Peter Redmond with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Peter Redmond more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Peter Redmond

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Peter Redmond. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Peter Redmond. The network helps show where Peter Redmond may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 12 scholars most cited alongside Peter Redmond, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Peter Redmond Line = papers co-authored together Peter Redmond links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

19 of 19 papers shown
#Work
1 196570
2 195869
3 196442
4 195433
5 195830
6 198028
7 202223
8 196022
9 195618
10 196414
11 20124
12 20232
13 19592
14 20241
15 20241
16 20221
17
Electrostatically formed antennas
19791
18 19571
19 19590

About Peter Redmond

Peter Redmond is a scholar working on Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Statistical and Nonlinear Physics, Cognitive Neuroscience, Nuclear and High Energy Physics and Civil and Structural Engineering, having authored 19 papers that have together received 362 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces (4 papers), Cold Atom Physics and Bose-Einstein Condensates (3 papers), Neural dynamics and brain function (3 papers), Advanced Thermodynamics and Statistical Mechanics (2 papers), Quantum Mechanics and Applications (2 papers), Structural Analysis and Optimization (2 papers), Experimental and Theoretical Physics Studies (2 papers) and Modular Robots and Swarm Intelligence (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Nuclear and High Energy Physics (148 citations), Statistical and Nonlinear Physics (71 citations), Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (175 citations), Mathematical Physics (20 citations) and Astronomy and Astrophysics (36 citations). Peter Redmond has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Ireland and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Jack L. Uretsky, Tomás Ward, Geraldine B. Boylan, Eoin Brophy, Maarten De Vos, Muhammad Awais, Graham Healy, Joan Cahill, Gerard Lacey and Rozenn Dahyot. Their work appears in journals such as Cognition Technology & Work, Journal of Neural Engineering, Journal of Spacecraft and Rockets, Annals of Physics and Physical Review Letters.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact