Peter R. Samson

482 total citations
35 papers, 383 citations indexed

About

Peter R. Samson is a scholar working on Plant Science, Insect Science and Molecular Biology. According to data from OpenAlex, Peter R. Samson has authored 35 papers receiving a total of 383 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 22 papers in Plant Science, 21 papers in Insect Science and 8 papers in Molecular Biology. Recurrent topics in Peter R. Samson's work include Insect Pest Control Strategies (14 papers), Insect Resistance and Genetics (8 papers) and Insect behavior and control techniques (7 papers). Peter R. Samson is often cited by papers focused on Insect Pest Control Strategies (14 papers), Insect Resistance and Genetics (8 papers) and Insect behavior and control techniques (7 papers). Peter R. Samson collaborates with scholars based in Australia, China and Saudi Arabia. Peter R. Samson's co-authors include Richard Milner, Elizabeth A. H. Hall, Richard Morton, Alan L. Jones, Barbara J. King, Margaret Ayre, Ruth Nettle, N Reichelt, Jana-Axinja Paschen and Nader Sallam and has published in prestigious journals such as Crop Protection, Journal of Economic Entomology and Environmental Entomology.

In The Last Decade

Peter R. Samson

33 papers receiving 343 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Peter R. Samson Australia 10 254 215 124 43 30 35 383
Ramasamy Srinivasan Taiwan 11 238 0.9× 149 0.7× 43 0.3× 66 1.5× 14 0.5× 19 359
John Nderitu Kenya 13 314 1.2× 207 1.0× 80 0.6× 57 1.3× 13 0.4× 58 450
Eduardo Hidalgo Costa Rica 12 207 0.8× 127 0.6× 66 0.5× 38 0.9× 20 0.7× 18 338
L. W. Kitch United States 11 538 2.1× 223 1.0× 263 2.1× 40 0.9× 10 0.3× 15 669
S. Vennila India 9 172 0.7× 152 0.7× 39 0.3× 16 0.4× 53 1.8× 56 340
Farzana Nowrin Bangladesh 6 432 1.7× 84 0.4× 37 0.3× 28 0.7× 50 1.7× 7 515
Marta de la Poza Spain 8 202 0.8× 208 1.0× 255 2.1× 7 0.2× 15 0.5× 12 323
Fábio Késsler Dal Soglio Brazil 9 204 0.8× 66 0.3× 39 0.3× 66 1.5× 18 0.6× 43 305
Resham Bahadur Thapa Nepal 8 124 0.5× 120 0.6× 43 0.3× 46 1.1× 12 0.4× 55 268
Jerome Kubiriba Uganda 17 719 2.8× 69 0.3× 122 1.0× 123 2.9× 23 0.8× 68 811

Countries citing papers authored by Peter R. Samson

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Peter R. Samson's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Peter R. Samson with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Peter R. Samson more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Peter R. Samson

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Peter R. Samson. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Peter R. Samson. The network helps show where Peter R. Samson may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Peter R. Samson

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Peter R. Samson. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Peter R. Samson based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Peter R. Samson. Peter R. Samson is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Ayre, Margaret, Peter R. Samson, Ruth Nettle, et al.. (2019). Supporting and practising digital innovation with advisers in smart farming. NJAS - Wageningen Journal of Life Sciences. 90-91(1). 1–12. 91 indexed citations
2.
Samson, Peter R., et al.. (2017). Resistance of Australian sugarcane clones to moth and weevil borers in Papua New Guinea. Crop Protection. 96. 14–21. 2 indexed citations
3.
Johansen, Kasper, et al.. (2014). Mapping canegrub damage from high spatial resolution satellite imagery. Queensland Department of Agriculture and Fisheries archive of scientific and research publications (Queensland Department of Agriculture and Fisheries). 62–70. 2 indexed citations
4.
Johansen, Kasper, et al.. (2014). Mapping whitegrub damage in sugarcane from high spatial resolution satellite imagery. Queensland's institutional digital repository (The University of Queensland). 3. 549–553. 3 indexed citations
5.
Magarey, R. C., et al.. (2012). Extension of better control practices for moth borers in the Indonesian sugar industry. Agritrop (Cirad). 3 indexed citations
6.
Magarey, R. C., et al.. (2012). Sugarcane pests and diseases : field guide. Indonesian version. Agritrop (Cirad). 1 indexed citations
7.
Magarey, R. C., et al.. (2010). IPM strategies for pest and disease control in Indonesia: Project overview and outcomes from recent aciar-funded research. Agritrop (Cirad). 169–180. 5 indexed citations
8.
Milner, Richard, Peter R. Samson, & Richard Morton. (2003). Persistence of Conidia ofMetarhizium anisopliaein Sugarcane Fields: Effect of isolate and formulation on persistence over 3.5 years. Biocontrol Science and Technology. 13(5). 507–516. 44 indexed citations
9.
Samson, Peter R. & Andrew A. Calder. (2003). Wireworm (Coleoptera: Elateridae) identity, monitoring and damage in sugarcane. Australian Journal of Entomology. 42(3). 298–303. 4 indexed citations
10.
Samson, Peter R.. (2002). Field response of sugarcane cultivars to sugarcane soldier fly, Inopus rubriceps (Macquart) (Diptera: Stratiomyidae). Australian Journal of Entomology. 41(3). 262–266. 4 indexed citations
11.
Samson, Peter R., et al.. (1995). Timing of Pupation of Inopus rubriceps (Macquart) (Diptera: Stratiomyidae) in Sugarcane Fields. Australian Journal of Entomology. 34(1). 37–41. 4 indexed citations
12.
Samson, Peter R., et al.. (1993). TOLERANCE OF SUGARCANE CLONES TO FEEDING BY INOPUS RUBRICEPS (MACQUART) (DIPTERA: STRATIOMYIDAE). Australian Journal of Entomology. 32(1). 37–42. 3 indexed citations
13.
Samson, Peter R., et al.. (1992). Distribution of Larvae of Inopus rubriceps (Diptera: Stratiomyidae) Around Sugarcane Plants. Journal of Economic Entomology. 85(6). 2185–2193. 3 indexed citations
14.
Samson, Peter R., et al.. (1990). Synergized deltamethrin as a protectant against Sitophilus zeamais Motsch. and S. oryzae (L.) (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) on stored maize. Journal of Stored Products Research. 26(3). 155–161. 16 indexed citations
15.
Samson, Peter R., et al.. (1989). Relative potency of grain protectants on maize, paddy rice, and wheat. Journal of Stored Products Research. 25(1). 31–38. 15 indexed citations
16.
Samson, Peter R., et al.. (1989). Laboratory studies on protectants for control of Coleoptera in maize. Journal of Stored Products Research. 25(1). 49–55. 24 indexed citations
17.
Samson, Peter R., et al.. (1988). Comparative Effect of Grain Moisture on the Biological Activity of Protect ants on Stored Corn. Journal of Economic Entomology. 81(3). 949–954. 21 indexed citations
18.
Samson, Peter R., et al.. (1988). Inactivation of fenitrothion on stored maize at different moisture contents. Pesticide Science. 22(1). 83–92. 1 indexed citations
19.
Samson, Peter R., et al.. (1987). The effect of grain moisture on the biological activity of fenitrothion residues on maize in storage. Pesticide Science. 19(2). 135–144. 6 indexed citations
20.
Samson, Peter R.. (1980). A General-Purpose Digital Synthesizer. Journal of the Audio Engineering Society. 28(3). 106–113. 8 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026