Peter R. Bream

974 total citations
41 papers, 588 citations indexed

About

Peter R. Bream is a scholar working on Surgery, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine and Emergency Medical Services. According to data from OpenAlex, Peter R. Bream has authored 41 papers receiving a total of 588 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 15 papers in Surgery, 15 papers in Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine and 11 papers in Emergency Medical Services. Recurrent topics in Peter R. Bream's work include Central Venous Catheters and Hemodialysis (11 papers), Congenital Heart Disease Studies (6 papers) and Vascular Procedures and Complications (6 papers). Peter R. Bream is often cited by papers focused on Central Venous Catheters and Hemodialysis (11 papers), Congenital Heart Disease Studies (6 papers) and Vascular Procedures and Complications (6 papers). Peter R. Bream collaborates with scholars based in United States, China and Australia. Peter R. Bream's co-authors include Larry P. Elliott, Benigno Soto, George C. Curry, L.M. Bargeron, Arthur Soares Souza, Derek E. Moore, William J. Rogers, Leigh Anne Dageforde, Alda L. Tam and Christopher R. Ingraham and has published in prestigious journals such as Circulation, American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine and Radiology.

In The Last Decade

Peter R. Bream

39 papers receiving 550 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Peter R. Bream United States 13 257 240 182 180 131 41 588
Ulrike Salzer‐Muhar Austria 14 274 1.1× 192 0.8× 146 0.8× 341 1.9× 61 0.5× 45 651
Doug Fraser United Kingdom 10 399 1.6× 400 1.7× 369 2.0× 112 0.6× 101 0.8× 20 800
J.T. Murchison United Kingdom 15 325 1.3× 210 0.9× 163 0.9× 65 0.4× 231 1.8× 31 868
G J Kieft Netherlands 13 105 0.4× 205 0.9× 173 1.0× 205 1.1× 352 2.7× 17 948
Jorge Salgado‐Fernández Spain 16 143 0.6× 181 0.8× 375 2.1× 61 0.3× 126 1.0× 43 566
Corey Teigen United States 10 213 0.8× 161 0.7× 153 0.8× 143 0.8× 147 1.1× 14 615
Funda Öztuna Türkiye 14 149 0.6× 77 0.3× 122 0.7× 128 0.7× 114 0.9× 57 591
Thomas J. Noto United States 7 323 1.3× 385 1.6× 376 2.1× 40 0.2× 390 3.0× 9 846
John Smythe Canada 14 395 1.5× 297 1.2× 337 1.9× 515 2.9× 151 1.2× 21 1.0k
Kim Duncan United States 16 279 1.1× 349 1.5× 166 0.9× 482 2.7× 72 0.5× 37 724

Countries citing papers authored by Peter R. Bream

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Peter R. Bream's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Peter R. Bream with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Peter R. Bream more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Peter R. Bream

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Peter R. Bream. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Peter R. Bream. The network helps show where Peter R. Bream may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Peter R. Bream

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Peter R. Bream. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Peter R. Bream based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Peter R. Bream. Peter R. Bream is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Park, Yara A., et al.. (2024). Use of a novel configuration of ports for patients needing intermittent long‐term apheresis. Journal of Clinical Apheresis. 39(4). e22143–e22143. 1 indexed citations
2.
Kim, Kyung Rae, et al.. (2022). Weighted Tip Extensions Result in Fewer Gastrojejunostomy Tube Migrations and Increase Tube Lifespan. Journal of Vascular and Interventional Radiology. 34(1). 124–129. 1 indexed citations
3.
Yuo, Theodore H., Charles Kim, Dheeraj K. Rajan, et al.. (2022). Hemodialysis Arteriovenous Access Cosmesis Scale (AVACS): A new measure for vascular access. The Journal of Vascular Access. 25(4). 1194–1203. 1 indexed citations
4.
Yu, Hyeon, Peter R. Bream, F. Nowakowski, et al.. (2021). Safety and Feasibility of a Novel Percutaneous Locoregional Injection Technique of Renal Cellular Therapy for Chronic Kidney Disease of Diabetes. Kidney International Reports. 6(9). 2486–2490. 3 indexed citations
5.
Yellin, Michael, et al.. (2020). Port Pocket Infections: Hydrogel Reduces Time to Healing and Clinic Visits Compared with Iodoform Gauze. Journal of Vascular and Interventional Radiology. 32(1). 87–91. 1 indexed citations
6.
Isom, Chelsea A., et al.. (2019). Placement of Subcutaneous Central Venous Ports in Breast Cancer Patients: Does Side Matter?. Journal of Surgical Research. 244. 296–301. 8 indexed citations
7.
Watchmaker, Jennifer M., et al.. (2018). 4:21 PM Abstract No. 150 Percutaneous cholecystolithotomy: missed opportunity in interventional radiology?. Journal of Vascular and Interventional Radiology. 29(4). S67–S67. 1 indexed citations
8.
Fischman, A., Peter R. Bream, J. Martín, et al.. (2018). Best Practices From the APDR. Academic Radiology. 25(6). 789–791. 11 indexed citations
9.
Rochon, Paul J., et al.. (2018). The State of Medical Student Teaching of Interventional Radiology: Implications for the Future. Journal of the American College of Radiology. 15(12). 1761–1764. 14 indexed citations
10.
Wadhwa, Vibhor, et al.. (2017). #TwittIR: Understanding and Establishing a Twitter Ecosystem for Interventional Radiologists and Their Practices. Journal of the American College of Radiology. 15(1). 218–223. 19 indexed citations
11.
12.
Robbins, Ivan M., Joyce Johnson, Michael R. Petracek, et al.. (2015). Translocation of Microspheres into the Pulmonary Artery after Bronchial Artery Injection. American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine. 191(12). e28–e29. 2 indexed citations
13.
Kensinger, Clark D., et al.. (2015). Multidisciplinary team approach to end-stage dialysis access patients. Journal of Surgical Research. 199(1). 259–265. 7 indexed citations
14.
Umanath, Kausik, et al.. (2012). In‐Center Thrombolysis for Clotted AV Access: A Cohort Review. Seminars in Dialysis. 26(1). 124–129. 6 indexed citations
15.
Dageforde, Leigh Anne, Peter R. Bream, & Derek E. Moore. (2012). Hemodialysis Reliable Outflow (HeRO) device in end-stage dialysis access: a decision analysis model. Journal of Surgical Research. 177(1). 165–171. 21 indexed citations
16.
Bream, Peter R., et al.. (2006). Treatment of SVC syndrome and hemoptysis in a patient with mediastinal fibrosis. Emergency Radiology. 12(5). 240–242. 4 indexed citations
17.
Wilner, Andrew N. & Peter R. Bream. (1993). Status epilepticus and pseudostatus epilepticus. Seizure. 2(3). 257–260. 8 indexed citations
18.
Bream, Peter R., et al.. (1992). Does memory loss occur after MR imaging?. Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging. 2(6). 721–728. 6 indexed citations
19.
Zimmern, Samuel H., William J. Rogers, Peter R. Bream, et al.. (1982). Total occlusion of the left main coronary artery: The Coronary Artery Surgery Study (CASS) experience. The American Journal of Cardiology. 49(8). 2003–2010. 51 indexed citations
20.
Soto, Benigno, et al.. (1979). Angiographic study of univentricular heart of right ventricular type.. Circulation. 60(6). 1325–1334. 23 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026