Péter Osváth

1.9k citations
134 papers · 1.4k · h-index 21

Impact in

Papers in

Péter Osváth

120 papers receiving 1.2k citations

Peers

Péter Osváth
Comparison fields: 5 of 145
  • Clinical Psychology 395
  • Inorganic Chemistry 202
  • Biological Psychiatry 29
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 172
  • Behavioral Neuroscience 39
Replace Subhash C. Bhatia with:
Subhash C. Bhatia United States
Mingsheng Huang China
André Mann France
Kunio Shimizu Japan
Gabriella Martino Italy
William F. Gabrielli United States
R. Kellner Austria
Christopher M. Thompson United States
Neeraj Gill Australia
Mark S. Greenberg United States
Péter Osváth relative to Subhash C. Bhatia United States Subhash C. Bhatia's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.7×
Subhash C. Bhatia · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Péter Osváth

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Péter Osváth's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Péter Osváth with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Péter Osváth more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Péter Osváth

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Péter Osváth. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Péter Osváth. The network helps show where Péter Osváth may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Péter Osváth, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Péter Osváth Line = papers co-authored together Péter Osváth links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 134 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1
[Gender differences in suicidal behavior].
200477
2 198862
3 200459
4 200151
5 201847
6 199736
7 202335
8 200333
9 200332
10
Gender differences in suicide attempters in Hungary: retrospective epidemiological study.
200531
11 201530
12 198729
13 202028
14 199327
15 201924
16 198924
17 200223
18 200323
19 199221
20 199921

About Péter Osváth

Péter Osváth is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, Oncology, Inorganic Chemistry, Psychiatry and Mental health and Materials Chemistry, having authored 134 papers that have together received 1.4k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Suicide and Self-Harm Studies (32 papers), Metal complexes synthesis and properties (20 papers), Metal-Catalyzed Oxygenation Mechanisms (13 papers), Magnetism in coordination complexes (12 papers), Porphyrin and Phthalocyanine Chemistry (9 papers), Mental Health Treatment and Access (7 papers), Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments (6 papers) and Electroconvulsive Therapy Studies (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Clinical Psychology (395 citations), Inorganic Chemistry (202 citations), Biological Psychiatry (29 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (172 citations) and Behavioral Neuroscience (39 citations). Péter Osváth has collaborated with scholars based in Hungary, United States and Switzerland. Frequent co-authors include Viktor Vörös, Sándor Fekete, A. Graham Lappin, Alan M. Sargeson, Tamás Tényi, David C. Weatherburn, S. Fekete, Zoltán Rihmer, Rosemary A. Marusak and Péter Döme. Their work appears in journals such as Inorganic Chemistry, Australian Journal of Chemistry, Journal of Affective Disorders, European Neuropsychopharmacology and BMC Psychiatry.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact