Peter N. Arrowsmith

729 total citations
11 papers, 505 citations indexed

About

Peter N. Arrowsmith is a scholar working on Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Epidemiology and Ophthalmology. According to data from OpenAlex, Peter N. Arrowsmith has authored 11 papers receiving a total of 505 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 11 papers in Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, 5 papers in Epidemiology and 4 papers in Ophthalmology. Recurrent topics in Peter N. Arrowsmith's work include Corneal surgery and disorders (11 papers), Corneal Surgery and Treatments (6 papers) and Ophthalmology and Visual Impairment Studies (5 papers). Peter N. Arrowsmith is often cited by papers focused on Corneal surgery and disorders (11 papers), Corneal Surgery and Treatments (6 papers) and Ophthalmology and Visual Impairment Studies (5 papers). Peter N. Arrowsmith collaborates with scholars based in United States. Peter N. Arrowsmith's co-authors include Ronald G. Marks, Donald R. Sanders, Vance Thompson, Robert K. Maloney, Kerry K. Assil, Maurice E. John, R. Doyle Stulting, Buddy Russell, Beth E. Meyerowitz and Maureen K. Powers and has published in prestigious journals such as Ophthalmology, Journal of Refractive Surgery and Archives of Ophthalmology.

In The Last Decade

Peter N. Arrowsmith

11 papers receiving 382 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Peter N. Arrowsmith United States 11 469 334 222 115 7 11 505
John A van Westenbrugge United States 9 466 1.0× 410 1.2× 183 0.8× 96 0.8× 3 0.4× 12 506
Michael R. Deitz United States 12 679 1.4× 519 1.6× 332 1.5× 116 1.0× 6 0.9× 19 708
Patrick Caroline United States 12 388 0.8× 239 0.7× 267 1.2× 225 2.0× 7 1.0× 29 460
Richard A Villaseñor United States 13 481 1.0× 346 1.0× 166 0.7× 112 1.0× 4 0.6× 26 501
George O. Waring United States 7 404 0.9× 305 0.9× 160 0.7× 91 0.8× 3 0.4× 7 422
Myhanh Nguyen United States 4 251 0.5× 158 0.5× 202 0.9× 123 1.1× 4 0.6× 5 301
Tracy Schroeder Swartz United States 8 340 0.7× 203 0.6× 207 0.9× 136 1.2× 2 0.3× 11 369
Juan Gros-Otero Spain 11 344 0.7× 352 1.1× 240 1.1× 74 0.6× 3 0.4× 40 417
Daniela Jardim Brazil 5 334 0.7× 214 0.6× 141 0.6× 142 1.2× 3 0.4× 7 351
Lee T. Nordan United States 10 418 0.9× 371 1.1× 222 1.0× 66 0.6× 1 0.1× 23 468

Countries citing papers authored by Peter N. Arrowsmith

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Peter N. Arrowsmith's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Peter N. Arrowsmith with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Peter N. Arrowsmith more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Peter N. Arrowsmith

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Peter N. Arrowsmith. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Peter N. Arrowsmith. The network helps show where Peter N. Arrowsmith may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Peter N. Arrowsmith

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Peter N. Arrowsmith. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Peter N. Arrowsmith based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Peter N. Arrowsmith. Peter N. Arrowsmith is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

11 of 11 papers shown
1.
Stulting, R. Doyle, Maurice E. John, Robert K. Maloney, et al.. (2007). Three-Year Results of Artisan/Verisyse Phakic Intraocular Lens Implantation. Ophthalmology. 115(3). 464–472.e1. 132 indexed citations
2.
Arrowsmith, Peter N.. (1989). Visual, Refractive, and Keratometric Results of Radial Keratotomy. Archives of Ophthalmology. 107(4). 506–506. 51 indexed citations
3.
Arrowsmith, Peter N., et al.. (1988). Corneal Sensitivity after Radial Keratotomy. Ophthalmology. 95(6). 827–832. 39 indexed citations
4.
Arrowsmith, Peter N. & Ronald G. Marks. (1988). Four-Year Update on Predictability of Radial Keratotomy. Journal of Refractive Surgery. 4(2). 37–45. 13 indexed citations
5.
Arrowsmith, Peter N., et al.. (1987). Contact Lenses in the Treatment of Patients with Overcorrected Radial Keratotomy. Ophthalmology. 94(8). 899–903. 29 indexed citations
6.
Arrowsmith, Peter N.. (1987). Visual, Refractive, and Keratometric Results of Radial Keratotomy. Archives of Ophthalmology. 105(1). 76–76. 26 indexed citations
7.
Arrowsmith, Peter N., et al.. (1986). Delayed Keratitis After Radial Keratotomy. Archives of Ophthalmology. 104(8). 1153–1155. 29 indexed citations
8.
Arrowsmith, Peter N. & Ronald G. Marks. (1985). Evaluating the Predictability of Radial Keratotomy. Ophthalmology. 92(3). 331–338. 36 indexed citations
9.
Arrowsmith, Peter N.. (1984). Visual, Refractive, and Keratometric Results of Radial Keratotomy. Archives of Ophthalmology. 102(11). 1612–1612. 40 indexed citations
10.
Powers, Maureen K., Beth E. Meyerowitz, Peter N. Arrowsmith, & Ronald G. Marks. (1984). Psychosocial Findings in Radial Keratotomy Patients Two Years After Surgery. Ophthalmology. 91(10). 1193–1198. 34 indexed citations
11.
Arrowsmith, Peter N., Donald R. Sanders, & Ronald G. Marks. (1983). Visual, Refractive, and Keratometric Results of Radial Keratotomy. Archives of Ophthalmology. 101(6). 873–881. 76 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026