Peter Meyer
- Biotechnology top 0.5%
- Transgenic Plants and Applications 8
- Plant Science top 0.5%
- Plant Molecular Biology Research 30
- Chromosomal and Genetic Variations 18
- Plant Genetic and Mutation Studies 17
- Plant Virus Research Studies 7
- Plant nutrient uptake and metabolism 7
- Molecular Biology top 2%
- Plant tissue culture and regeneration 29
- CRISPR and Genetic Engineering 7
- Horticulture top 10%
- Biochemistry top 10%
- Co-authors
- Heinz SaedlerIris HeidmannIngrid NiedenhofElena ZubkoG. ForkmannFelicitas PrölsCharles P. ScuttWilma Ziebuhr
- Partner nations
- United KingdomGermanyUnited States
In The Last Decade
Peter Meyer
89 papers receiving 3.7k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 133
- Biotechnology 747
- Plant Science 2.3k
- Molecular Biology 3.2k
- Horticulture 16
- Biochemistry 76
Countries citing papers authored by Peter Meyer
This map shows the geographic impact of Peter Meyer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Peter Meyer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Peter Meyer more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Peter Meyer
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Peter Meyer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Peter Meyer. The network helps show where Peter Meyer may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Peter Meyer, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2024 | 2 | |
| 2 | Chapter one - epigenetics - a historical perspective. | 2018 | 2 |
| 3 | 2017 | 123 | |
| 4 | 2012 | 36 | |
| 5 | 2009 | 9 | |
| 6 | 2008 | 30 | |
| 7 | 2008 | 19 | |
| 8 | 2007 | 54 | |
| 9 | 2006 | 10 | |
| 10 | 2005 | 104 | |
| 11 | A CDC45 homolog in Arabidopsis is essential for meiosis, as shown by RNA interference-induced gene silencing | 2003 | 10 |
| 12 | 2003 | 21 | |
| 13 | 2001 | 22 | |
| 14 | 2000 | 127 | |
| 15 | 1999 | 62 | |
| 16 | 1995 | 13 | |
| 17 | 1992 | 118 | |
| 18 | 1992 | 10 | |
| 19 | South African plant parasitic mites of the families Tenuipalpidae and Tuckerellidae (Acarina: Prostigmata). | 1959 | 5 |
| 20 | A revision of the spider mites (Acarina: Tetranychidae) of South Africa with descriptions of a new genus and new species | 1959 | 10 |
About Peter Meyer
Peter Meyer is a scholar working on Plant Science, Molecular Biology and Biotechnology, having authored 90 papers that have together received 4.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Plant Molecular Biology Research (30 papers), Plant tissue culture and regeneration (29 papers), Chromosomal and Genetic Variations (18 papers), Plant Genetic and Mutation Studies (17 papers), Transgenic Plants and Applications (8 papers), CRISPR and Genetic Engineering (7 papers), Plant Virus Research Studies (7 papers) and Plant nutrient uptake and metabolism (7 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Biotechnology (747 citations), Plant Science (2.3k citations) and Molecular Biology (3.2k citations). Peter Meyer has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Germany and United States. Frequent co-authors include Heinz Saedler, Iris Heidmann, Ingrid Niedenhof, Elena Zubko, G. Forkmann, Felicitas Pröls, Charles P. Scutt, Wilma Ziebuhr, K. Wilms and Jörg Hacker. Their work appears in journals such as The Plant Journal, PLoS ONE, Journal of Biological Chemistry, Plant Science and Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.