Peter Maher

1.7k citations
75 papers · 1.2k indexed · h-index 21

Impact in

Papers in

Peter Maher

71 papers receiving 1.1k citations

Peers

Peter Maher
Comparison fields: 5 of 82
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology 801
  • Reproductive Medicine 680
  • Surgery 455
  • Emergency Medicine 71
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 121
Replace Erin T. Carey with:
Erin T. Carey United States
Marco A. Pelosi United States
Howard T. Sharp United States
Håkan Rydhstroem Sweden
G. Rodney Meeks United States
Harold Gee United Kingdom
J. Eric Jelovsek United States
Adam Ostrzenski United States
Niyazi Tuğ Türkiye
C. Rhodes United Kingdom
Peter Maher relative to Erin T. Carey United States Erin T. Carey's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×6.5×
Erin T. Carey · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Peter Maher

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Peter Maher's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Peter Maher with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Peter Maher more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Peter Maher

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Peter Maher. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Peter Maher. The network helps show where Peter Maher may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Peter Maher, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Peter Maher Line = papers co-authored together Peter Maher links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 75 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2007100
2 199052
3 201851
4 200346
5 199444
6 201443
7 200440
8 200139
9 199638
10 199438
11 201635
12 199233
13 200831
14 200131
15 199930
16 201428
17 199327
18 200427
19 199721
20 199221

About Peter Maher

Peter Maher is a scholar working on Obstetrics and Gynecology, Reproductive Medicine, Surgery, Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health and Emergency Medicine, having authored 75 papers that have together received 1.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Uterine Myomas and Treatments (42 papers), Endometriosis Research and Treatment (37 papers), Gynecological conditions and treatments (17 papers), Intestinal and Peritoneal Adhesions (12 papers), Minimally Invasive Surgical Techniques (10 papers), Endometrial and Cervical Cancer Treatments (9 papers), Maternal and fetal healthcare (8 papers) and Appendicitis Diagnosis and Management (7 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Obstetrics and Gynecology (801 citations), Reproductive Medicine (680 citations), Surgery (455 citations), Emergency Medicine (71 citations) and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (121 citations). Peter Maher has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United States and New Zealand. Frequent co-authors include Carl Wood, Emma Readman, David J. Hill, Andrew K. Davey, David Hill, David J. Hill, Martin Healey, E. C. Wood, Lenore Ellett and Nesrin Varol. Their work appears in journals such as Australian and New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology, The Medical Journal of Australia, European Journal of Radiology and Human Reproduction.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact