Peter Lewis
- Mechanical Engineering
- Cognitive Neuroscience top 10%
- Mechanics of Materials top 10%
- Materials Chemistry
- Epidemiology
- Co-authors
- Colin GaggEdgar MillerC. W. McCutchenPeter UnsboJörgen GustafssonRobert RosénLinda LundströmAbinaya Priya Venkataraman
- Topics
- Ophthalmology and Visual Impairment Studies (7 papers)Visual perception and processing mechanisms (5 papers)Mechanical Failure Analysis and Simulation (4 papers)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomSwedenPortugal
In The Last Decade
Peter Lewis
36 papers receiving 546 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 138
- Mechanical Engineering 160
- Cognitive Neuroscience 124
- Mechanics of Materials 106
- Materials Chemistry 83
- Epidemiology 62
Countries citing papers authored by Peter Lewis
This map shows the geographic impact of Peter Lewis's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Peter Lewis with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Peter Lewis more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Peter Lewis
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Peter Lewis. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Peter Lewis. The network helps show where Peter Lewis may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Peter Lewis
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Peter Lewis. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Peter Lewis based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Peter Lewis. Peter Lewis is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 12 | |
| 2 | Forensic Materials Engineering: Case Studies | 2 |
| 3 | 4 | |
| 4 | Visual and psychological outcomes in patients with and without low vision diagnosed with similar eye diseases - initial results. | 2 |
| 5 | 12 | |
| 6 | Optical Correction and Stimulus Motion to Improve Vision in Eccentric Preferred Retinal Locus | 1 |
| 7 | 12 | |
| 8 | Dynamic Stimulus Presentation Facilitates Peripheral Resolution Acuity | 1 |
| 9 | The Effect of Refractive-Correction on Peripheral Low-Contrast Resolution Acuity | 1 |
| 10 | 18 | |
| 11 | 14 | |
| 12 | 5 | |
| 13 | 8 | |
| 14 | Ozone Cracking of Seals in Microchip Production | 0 |
| 15 | 3 | |
| 16 | Beautiful Railway Bridge of the Silvery Tay | 2 |
| 17 | 10 | |
| 18 | 17 | |
| 19 | 11 | |
| 20 | 5 |
About Peter Lewis
Peter Lewis is a scholar working on Ophthalmology, Metals and Alloys and Cognitive Neuroscience, having authored 37 papers that have together received 591 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Ophthalmology and Visual Impairment Studies (7 papers), Visual perception and processing mechanisms (5 papers) and Mechanical Failure Analysis and Simulation (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology (11 citations), Metals and Alloys (18 citations) and Archeology (7 citations). Peter Lewis has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Sweden and Portugal. Frequent co-authors include Colin Gagg, Edgar Miller, C. W. McCutchen, Peter Unsbo, Jörgen Gustafsson, Robert Rosén, Linda Lundström, Abinaya Priya Venkataraman, Peter Tyrer and Rui Santana. Their work appears in journals such as Nature, The Journal of Physiology and Journal of Colloid and Interface Science.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.