Peter L. Scardino
- Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine
- Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health top 10%
- Urology top 5%
- Surgery
- Obstetrics and Gynecology top 10%
- Co-authors
- Charles L. PrinceRobert B. SmithJohn AndersonWilliam W. ScottDavid A. BloomWillard E. GoodwinRobert MorganWilliam H. Davis
- Topics
- Ureteral procedures and complications (7 papers)Urological Disorders and Treatments (7 papers)Pediatric Urology and Nephrology Studies (6 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesNetherlandsFrance
In The Last Decade
Peter L. Scardino
30 papers receiving 305 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 60
- Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 198
- Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health 129
- Urology 111
- Surgery 85
- Obstetrics and Gynecology 61
Countries citing papers authored by Peter L. Scardino
This map shows the geographic impact of Peter L. Scardino's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Peter L. Scardino with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Peter L. Scardino more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Peter L. Scardino
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Peter L. Scardino. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Peter L. Scardino. The network helps show where Peter L. Scardino may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Peter L. Scardino
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Peter L. Scardino. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Peter L. Scardino based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Peter L. Scardino. Peter L. Scardino is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 10 | |
| 2 | Ki-67 is an independent predictor of outcome in conservatively treated clinically localised prostate cancer | 1 |
| 3 | 8 | |
| 4 | 3 | |
| 5 | 15 | |
| 6 | 12 | |
| 7 | 1 | |
| 8 | 8 | |
| 9 | 23 | |
| 10 | 11 | |
| 11 | 6 | |
| 12 | 5 | |
| 13 | 3 | |
| 14 | 79 | |
| 15 | 51 | |
| 16 | 1 | |
| 17 | 8 | |
| 18 | 4 | |
| 19 | 4 | |
| 20 | 47 |
About Peter L. Scardino
Peter L. Scardino is a scholar working on Urology, Obstetrics and Gynecology and Family Practice, having authored 31 papers that have together received 349 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Ureteral procedures and complications (7 papers), Urological Disorders and Treatments (7 papers) and Pediatric Urology and Nephrology Studies (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Urology (111 citations), Obstetrics and Gynecology (61 citations) and Complementary and Manual Therapy (16 citations). Peter L. Scardino has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Netherlands and France. Frequent co-authors include Charles L. Prince, Robert B. Smith, John Anderson, William W. Scott, David A. Bloom, Willard E. Goodwin, Robert Morgan, William H. Davis, Jean de la Rosette and Clarence V. Hodges. Their work appears in journals such as The Journal of Urology, Urology and Modern Pathology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.