Peter L. Mente
Impact in
- Pharmaceutical Science top 2%
- Advancements in Transdermal Drug Delivery
-
- Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology
Papers in ⓘ
-
- Tendon Structure and Treatment 4
- Co-authors
- J. L. Lewis (2 shared papers)David D. Aronsson (6 shared papers)James C. Iatridis (5 shared papers)Ian A. F. Stokes (5 shared papers)Anand Doraiswamy (2 shared papers)Boris N. Chichkov (2 shared papers)Aleksandr Ovsianikov (2 shared papers)Mauro Alini (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Journal of Orthopaedic Research® (5 papers)Veterinary Surgery (4 papers)Poultry Science (3 papers)Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery (2 papers)Spine (2 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesChinaGermany
In The Last Decade
Peter L. Mente
29 papers receiving 1.4k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 112
- Pharmaceutical Science 138
- Pathology and Forensic Medicine 398
- Orthopedics and Sports Medicine 139
- Rheumatology 213
- Surgery 615
Countries citing papers authored by Peter L. Mente
This map shows the geographic impact of Peter L. Mente's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Peter L. Mente with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Peter L. Mente more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Peter L. Mente
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Peter L. Mente. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Peter L. Mente. The network helps show where Peter L. Mente may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Peter L. Mente, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 33 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1999 | 239 | |
| 2 | 2007 | 203 | |
| 3 | 1994 | 182 | |
| 4 | 2006 | 176 | |
| 5 | 2002 | 98 | |
| 6 | 1997 | 88 | |
| 7 | 1999 | 85 | |
| 8 | 1995 | 75 | |
| 9 | 1989 | 57 | |
| 10 | 2012 | 47 | |
| 11 | 2008 | 46 | |
| 12 | 2009 | 20 | |
| 13 | 2008 | 19 | |
| 14 | 2011 | 17 | |
| 15 | 2012 | 15 | |
| 16 | 2013 | 13 | |
| 17 | 2014 | 13 | |
| 18 | 2006 | 12 | |
| 19 | 1996 | 12 | |
| 20 | 2004 | 9 |
About Peter L. Mente
Peter L. Mente is a scholar working on Orthopedics and Sports Medicine, Architecture, Equine, Small Animals and Surgery, having authored 33 papers that have together received 1.5k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology (7 papers), Osteoarthritis Treatment and Mechanisms (6 papers), Knee injuries and reconstruction techniques (5 papers), Scoliosis diagnosis and treatment (5 papers), Lower Extremity Biomechanics and Pathologies (4 papers), Tendon Structure and Treatment (4 papers), Veterinary Orthopedics and Neurology (4 papers) and Animal Nutrition and Physiology (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Pharmaceutical Science (138 citations), Pathology and Forensic Medicine (398 citations), Orthopedics and Sports Medicine (139 citations), Rheumatology (213 citations) and Surgery (615 citations). Peter L. Mente has collaborated with scholars based in United States, China and Germany. Frequent co-authors include J. L. Lewis, David D. Aronsson, James C. Iatridis, Ian A. F. Stokes, Anand Doraiswamy, Boris N. Chichkov, Aleksandr Ovsianikov, Mauro Alini, Nancy A. Monteiro‐Riviere and Roger J. Narayan. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Orthopaedic Research®, Veterinary Surgery, Poultry Science, Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery and Spine.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.