Peter Kuperus

409 total citations
10 papers, 315 citations indexed

About

Peter Kuperus is a scholar working on Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Genetics and Molecular Biology. According to data from OpenAlex, Peter Kuperus has authored 10 papers receiving a total of 315 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 6 papers in Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, 4 papers in Genetics and 2 papers in Molecular Biology. Recurrent topics in Peter Kuperus's work include Genetic diversity and population structure (3 papers), Plant Ecology and Taxonomy Studies (2 papers) and Chromosomal and Genetic Variations (2 papers). Peter Kuperus is often cited by papers focused on Genetic diversity and population structure (3 papers), Plant Ecology and Taxonomy Studies (2 papers) and Chromosomal and Genetic Variations (2 papers). Peter Kuperus collaborates with scholars based in Netherlands, Germany and United States. Peter Kuperus's co-authors include Peter H. van Tienderen, Marc Stift, Camillo Bérénos, Pieternella C. Luttikhuizen, Guido van Reenen, Klaas G.J. Nierop, Ian D. Bull, Hugh Cross, André Aptroot and Erwin J. O. Kompanje and has published in prestigious journals such as Nature Communications, Genetics and Molecular Ecology.

In The Last Decade

Peter Kuperus

8 papers receiving 311 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Peter Kuperus Netherlands	6	147	102	68	60	60	10	315
Eva L. Koch United Kingdom	10	27 0.2×	117 1.1×	56 0.8×	53 0.9×	141 2.4×	16	349
Osamu Maeda Japan	9	57 0.4×	34 0.3×	60 0.9×	90 1.5×	80 1.3×	18	345
Linda Herveux France	5	72 0.5×	50 0.5×	9 0.1×	95 1.6×	29 0.5×	12	326
John Leslie Dowe Australia	11	89 0.6×	76 0.7×	114 1.7×	15 0.3×	120 2.0×	57	417
Terry A. Lott United States	10	68 0.5×	26 0.3×	156 2.3×	10 0.2×	34 0.6×	19	386
Sri Budi sulianti Indonesia	3	46 0.3×	69 0.7×	14 0.2×	6 0.1×	85 1.4×	5	310
Jun Matsubayashi Japan	10	98 0.7×	9 0.1×	91 1.3×	22 0.4×	153 2.5×	27	347
Jacques Cayouette Canada	10	274 1.9×	60 0.6×	39 0.6×	42 0.7×	72 1.2×	30	345
Peter Linder Switzerland	9	133 0.9×	55 0.5×	92 1.4×	7 0.1×	35 0.6×	13	331
Seona Anderson United Kingdom	6	84 0.6×	8 0.1×	48 0.7×	42 0.7×	31 0.5×	8	333

Countries citing papers authored by Peter Kuperus

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Peter Kuperus's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Peter Kuperus with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Peter Kuperus more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Peter Kuperus

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Peter Kuperus. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Peter Kuperus. The network helps show where Peter Kuperus may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Peter Kuperus

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Peter Kuperus. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Peter Kuperus based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Peter Kuperus. Peter Kuperus is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

10 of 10 papers shown

Kuperus, Peter, et al.. (2024). Ecological immunology: do sexual attraction and immunity trade‐off through a desaturase?. Insect Science. 32(1). 290–300.

Fouchier, Arthur de, et al.. (2023). Lipases and carboxylesterases affect moth sex pheromone compounds involved in interspecific mate recognition. Nature Communications. 14(1). 7505–7505.

Kuperus, Peter, et al.. (2020). DNA methylation patterns in the tobacco budworm, Chloridea virescens. Insect Biochemistry and Molecular Biology. 121. 103370–103370. 2 indexed citations

Groot, Astrid T., et al.. (2019). Within-population variability in a moth sex pheromone blend, part 2: selection towards fixation. Royal Society Open Science. 6(3). 182050–182050. 8 indexed citations

Breeuwer, Johannes A. J., et al.. (2013). Ultraviolet‐B‐driven pigmentation and genetic diversity of benthic macroinvertebrates from high‐altitude Andean streams. Freshwater Biology. 58(8). 1710–1719. 11 indexed citations

Baat, Milo L. de, et al.. (2013). Metals and altitude drive genetic diversity of chironomids in Andean streams. Freshwater Biology. 59(1). 56–63. 10 indexed citations

Stift, Marc, Camillo Bérénos, Peter Kuperus, & Peter H. van Tienderen. (2008). Segregation Models for Disomic, Tetrasomic and Intermediate Inheritance in Tetraploids: A General Procedure Applied to Rorippa (Yellow Cress) Microsatellite Data. Genetics. 179(4). 2113–2123. 121 indexed citations

Geel, B. van, André Aptroot, Claudia Baittinger, et al.. (2008). The Ecological implications of a Yakutian mammoth's last meal. Quaternary Research. 69(3). 361–376. 113 indexed citations

Luttikhuizen, Pieternella C., Marc Stift, Peter Kuperus, & Peter H. van Tienderen. (2007). Genetic diversity in diploid vs. tetraploid Rorippa amphibia (Brassicaceae). Molecular Ecology. 16(17). 3544–3553. 45 indexed citations

10.

Stift, Marc, Peter Kuperus, & Peter H. van Tienderen. (2006). Development of highly conserved primers for 12 new polymorphic microsatellite loci for the genus Rorippa Scop. (Brassicaceae), yellow‐cress. Molecular Ecology Notes. 6(4). 1129–1131. 5 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact