John Leslie Dowe

99 total papers · 527 total citations
57 papers, 417 citations indexed

About

John Leslie Dowe is a scholar working on Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Molecular Biology and Plant Science. According to data from OpenAlex, John Leslie Dowe has authored 57 papers receiving a total of 417 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 43 papers in Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, 14 papers in Molecular Biology and 13 papers in Plant Science. Recurrent topics in John Leslie Dowe's work include Plant Diversity and Evolution (37 papers), Plant and animal studies (25 papers) and Plant and Fungal Species Descriptions (13 papers). John Leslie Dowe is often cited by papers focused on Plant Diversity and Evolution (37 papers), Plant and animal studies (25 papers) and Plant and Fungal Species Descriptions (13 papers). John Leslie Dowe collaborates with scholars based in Australia, Italy and Denmark. John Leslie Dowe's co-authors include Matthew Prebble, Damien Burrows, E. Ballment, John Benzie, Carl E. Lewis, Jean‐Christophe Pintaud, Maria V. Norup, Vincent Savolainen, James J. Clarkson and Mark W. Chase and has published in prestigious journals such as Biological Conservation, Quaternary Science Reviews and Annals of Botany.

In The Last Decade

John Leslie Dowe

49 papers receiving 376 citations

Author Peers

Peers are selected by citation overlap in the author's most active subfields. citations · hero ref

Author Last Decade Papers Cites
John Leslie Dowe 221 121 114 96 89 57 417
Jacques Florence 216 1.0× 121 1.0× 74 0.6× 113 1.2× 100 1.1× 44 427
David H. Lorence 250 1.1× 110 0.9× 133 1.2× 125 1.3× 116 1.3× 31 434
Philippe Morat 366 1.7× 46 0.4× 144 1.3× 143 1.5× 104 1.2× 30 485
Jia‐Yee S. Yap 173 0.8× 67 0.6× 150 1.3× 124 1.3× 90 1.0× 32 377
Arnoldo Santos Guerra 198 0.9× 59 0.5× 97 0.9× 78 0.8× 206 2.3× 51 421
Bernard Michaux 189 0.9× 63 0.5× 72 0.6× 76 0.8× 50 0.6× 35 418
Juan Ernesto Guevara 201 0.9× 81 0.7× 55 0.5× 170 1.8× 80 0.9× 27 413
Benjamin T. Wilder 71 0.3× 110 0.9× 35 0.3× 74 0.8× 104 1.2× 28 372
Theresa L. Cole 52 0.2× 203 1.7× 85 0.7× 70 0.7× 25 0.3× 27 376
André Aubréville 244 1.1× 51 0.4× 96 0.8× 101 1.1× 142 1.6× 33 455

Countries citing papers authored by John Leslie Dowe

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of John Leslie Dowe's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John Leslie Dowe with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John Leslie Dowe more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by John Leslie Dowe

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by John Leslie Dowe. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John Leslie Dowe. The network helps show where John Leslie Dowe may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of John Leslie Dowe

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of John Leslie Dowe. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of John Leslie Dowe based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with John Leslie Dowe. John Leslie Dowe is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Loading papers...

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026