Peter Kraker

868 total citations
39 papers, 393 citations indexed

About

Peter Kraker is a scholar working on Information Systems, Information Systems and Management and Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty. According to data from OpenAlex, Peter Kraker has authored 39 papers receiving a total of 393 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 18 papers in Information Systems, 11 papers in Information Systems and Management and 7 papers in Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty. Recurrent topics in Peter Kraker's work include Research Data Management Practices (12 papers), Scientific Computing and Data Management (11 papers) and scientometrics and bibliometrics research (7 papers). Peter Kraker is often cited by papers focused on Research Data Management Practices (12 papers), Scientific Computing and Data Management (11 papers) and scientometrics and bibliometrics research (7 papers). Peter Kraker collaborates with scholars based in Austria, United Kingdom and Germany. Peter Kraker's co-authors include Elisabeth Lex, Juan Gorraiz, Christian Gumpenberger, Isabella Peters, Christian Schlögl, Wolfgang Reinhardt, Derick Leony, Stefanie Lindstaedt, Christian Körner and Michael Granitzer and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Scientometrics and Journal of Informetrics.

In The Last Decade

Peter Kraker

35 papers receiving 351 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Peter Kraker Austria 10 186 143 116 45 41 39 393
Damon McDougall United States 3 179 1.0× 173 1.2× 178 1.5× 32 0.7× 31 0.8× 8 455
Ryan Chute United States 4 158 0.8× 306 2.1× 80 0.7× 51 1.1× 64 1.6× 5 591
Kaitlin Thaney United Kingdom 2 180 1.0× 174 1.2× 181 1.6× 30 0.7× 31 0.8× 2 438
Amye Kenall Germany 5 243 1.3× 194 1.4× 240 2.1× 40 0.9× 35 0.9× 5 537
Fernanda Peset Spain 11 127 0.7× 82 0.6× 63 0.5× 37 0.8× 39 1.0× 59 368
Yassine Gargouri Canada 4 137 0.7× 274 1.9× 127 1.1× 18 0.4× 20 0.5× 6 401
Kathryn La Barre United States 7 117 0.6× 203 1.4× 50 0.4× 61 1.4× 39 1.0× 23 410
Heather Lea Moulaison United States 12 201 1.1× 39 0.3× 50 0.4× 53 1.2× 60 1.5× 79 412
Terrell Russell United States 10 104 0.6× 91 0.6× 57 0.5× 65 1.4× 26 0.6× 21 329
Mahshid Abdoli United Kingdom 11 76 0.4× 172 1.2× 54 0.5× 29 0.6× 76 1.9× 21 340

Countries citing papers authored by Peter Kraker

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Peter Kraker's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Peter Kraker with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Peter Kraker more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Peter Kraker

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Peter Kraker. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Peter Kraker. The network helps show where Peter Kraker may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Peter Kraker

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Peter Kraker. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Peter Kraker based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Peter Kraker. Peter Kraker is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Paoli, Stefano De, et al.. (2022). Defining discovery: Is Google Scholar a discovery platform? An essay on the need for a new approach to scholarly discovery. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 2. 28–28. 1 indexed citations
2.
Paoli, Stefano De, et al.. (2022). Defining discovery: Is Google Scholar a discovery platform? An essay on the need for a new approach to scholarly discovery. Open Research Europe. 2. 28–28. 2 indexed citations
3.
Kraker, Peter, et al.. (2021). Discoverability in (a) Crisis. 41(1). 3–12. 7 indexed citations
4.
Jeschke, Jonathan M., et al.. (2021). Towards an open, zoomable atlas for invasion science and beyond. NeoBiota. 68. 5–18. 13 indexed citations
5.
Mayer, Katja, et al.. (2020). Empfehlungen für eine nationale Open Science Strategie in Österreich / Recommendations for a National Open Science Strategy in Austria. Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research). 2 indexed citations
6.
Kraker, Peter, et al.. (2016). The Vienna Principles: A Vision for Scholarly Communication in the 21st Century. Mitteilungen der Vereinigung Österreichischer Bibliothekarinnen und Bibliothekare. 69(3-4). 436–446. 13 indexed citations
7.
Kraker, Peter, et al.. (2016). Open Knowledge Maps: Creating a Visual Interface to the World’s Scientific Knowledge Based on Natural Language Processing. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 4(2). 98–103. 18 indexed citations
8.
Peters, Isabella, Peter Kraker, Elisabeth Lex, Christian Gumpenberger, & Juan Gorraiz. (2016). Research data explored: an extended analysis of citations and altmetrics. Scientometrics. 107(2). 723–744. 95 indexed citations
9.
Peters, Isabella, Peter Kraker, Elisabeth Lex, Christian Gumpenberger, & Juan Gorraiz. (2015). Research Data Explored: Citations versus Altmetrics. arXiv (Cornell University). 1 indexed citations
10.
Kraker, Peter, et al.. (2015). Visualization of co-readership patterns from an online reference management system. Journal of Informetrics. 9(1). 169–182. 15 indexed citations
11.
Kraker, Peter, et al.. (2015). Open Science in Österreich: Ansätze und Status. 66(2-3). 5 indexed citations
12.
Kraker, Peter & Elisabeth Lex. (2015). A Critical Look At The Researchgate Score As A Measure Of Scientific Reputation. Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research). 30 indexed citations
13.
Kraker, Peter, et al.. (2014). Altmetrics-based Visualizations Depicting the Evolution of a Knowledge Domain. D-Scholarship@Pitt (University of Pittsburgh). 4 indexed citations
14.
15.
Kraker, Peter & Stefanie Lindstaedt. (2013). Research Practices on the Web in the Field of Technology Enhanced Learning. Figshare. 4 indexed citations
16.
Kraker, Peter, et al.. (2013). Assessing Barcamps. 1–8. 2 indexed citations
17.
Kraker, Peter, et al.. (2013). Towards a Model of Interdisciplinary Teamwork for Web Science: What can Social Theory Contribute?. University of Twente Research Information.
18.
Kraker, Peter, et al.. (2012). Harnessing user library statistics for research evaluation and knowledge domain visualization. 1017–1024. 13 indexed citations
19.
Kraker, Peter, et al.. (2011). The case for an open science in technology enhanced learning. International Journal of Technology Enhanced Learning. 3(6). 643–643. 36 indexed citations
20.
Kraker, Peter, et al.. (2009). Ergebnisse einer Untersuchung von Anbietern von Suchmaschinen-Technologien. 12(13). 118–127.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026