Peter Klepeis

1.7k total citations
24 papers, 1.2k citations indexed

About

Peter Klepeis is a scholar working on Global and Planetary Change, General Agricultural and Biological Sciences and Economics and Econometrics. According to data from OpenAlex, Peter Klepeis has authored 24 papers receiving a total of 1.2k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 23 papers in Global and Planetary Change, 8 papers in General Agricultural and Biological Sciences and 6 papers in Economics and Econometrics. Recurrent topics in Peter Klepeis's work include Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management (16 papers), Land Use and Ecosystem Services (7 papers) and Rural development and sustainability (5 papers). Peter Klepeis is often cited by papers focused on Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management (16 papers), Land Use and Ecosystem Services (7 papers) and Rural development and sustainability (5 papers). Peter Klepeis collaborates with scholars based in United States, Australia and Germany. Peter Klepeis's co-authors include Colin Vance, Nicholas Gill, B. L. Turner, Laurie Chisholm, David Barton Bray, Rinku Roy Chowdhury, Jacqueline Geoghegan, Yelena Ogneva‐Himmelberger, Pedro Antonio Macario-Mendoza and Sergio Cortina-Villar and has published in prestigious journals such as Agriculture Ecosystems & Environment, Forest Ecology and Management and Land Use Policy.

In The Last Decade

Peter Klepeis

24 papers receiving 1.1k citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Peter Klepeis United States 17 862 278 202 188 186 24 1.2k
John O. Browder United States 21 879 1.0× 371 1.3× 242 1.2× 169 0.9× 224 1.2× 34 1.4k
Jean-Laurent Pfund Indonesia 11 1.1k 1.2× 289 1.0× 296 1.5× 217 1.2× 150 0.8× 14 1.4k
Søren Bech Pilgaard Kristensen Denmark 21 883 1.0× 476 1.7× 162 0.8× 175 0.9× 143 0.8× 40 1.4k
Peter Bezák Slovakia 13 938 1.1× 290 1.0× 265 1.3× 237 1.3× 182 1.0× 17 1.5k
Julie G. Zaehringer Switzerland 23 778 0.9× 249 0.9× 206 1.0× 184 1.0× 162 0.9× 51 1.2k
Edward A. Ellis Mexico 19 1.3k 1.5× 238 0.9× 389 1.9× 193 1.0× 288 1.5× 43 1.7k
Michael Day Indonesia 4 794 0.9× 191 0.7× 241 1.2× 183 1.0× 123 0.7× 5 1.1k
Cora van Oosten Netherlands 9 1.1k 1.2× 265 1.0× 272 1.3× 251 1.3× 128 0.7× 12 1.4k
Manuel Ruíz Pérez Spain 19 767 0.9× 168 0.6× 145 0.7× 160 0.9× 243 1.3× 42 1.2k
Sonya Dewi Indonesia 18 801 0.9× 187 0.7× 342 1.7× 120 0.6× 197 1.1× 47 1.2k

Countries citing papers authored by Peter Klepeis

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Peter Klepeis's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Peter Klepeis with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Peter Klepeis more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Peter Klepeis

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Peter Klepeis. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Peter Klepeis. The network helps show where Peter Klepeis may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Peter Klepeis

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Peter Klepeis. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Peter Klepeis based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Peter Klepeis. Peter Klepeis is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Klepeis, Peter, et al.. (2018). Ethiopian church forests: a socio-religious conservation model under change. Journal of Eastern African Studies. 12(4). 674–695. 19 indexed citations
2.
Cardelús, Catherine L., et al.. (2017). Shadow conservation and the persistence of sacred church forests in northern Ethiopia. Biotropica. 49(5). 726–733. 28 indexed citations
3.
Klepeis, Peter, et al.. (2016). Ethiopian Church Forests: A Hybrid Model of Protection. Human Ecology. 44(6). 715–730. 42 indexed citations
4.
Woods, Carrie L., et al.. (2016). Stone walls and sacred forest conservation in Ethiopia. Biodiversity and Conservation. 26(1). 209–221. 30 indexed citations
5.
Scull, Peter, Catherine L. Cardelús, Peter Klepeis, et al.. (2016). The Resilience of Ethiopian Church Forests: Interpreting Aerial Photographs, 1938–2015. Land Degradation and Development. 28(2). 450–458. 37 indexed citations
6.
Geoghegan, Jacqueline, Deborah Lawrence, Claudia Radel, et al.. (2015). Land system science and the social–environmental system: the case of Southern Yucatán Peninsular Region (SYPR) project. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability. 19. 18–29. 24 indexed citations
7.
Gill, Nicholas, et al.. (2014). Same but different: sources of natural resource management advice for lifestyle oriented rural landholders. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management. 58(9). 1530–1543. 16 indexed citations
8.
Klepeis, Peter, et al.. (2013). Changing forest recovery dynamics in the northeastern United States. Area. 45(2). 239–248. 2 indexed citations
9.
Chisholm, Laurie, et al.. (2011). An automated land subdivision tool for urban and regional planning: Concepts, implementation and testing. Environmental Modelling & Software. 26(12). 1675–1684. 28 indexed citations
10.
Klepeis, Peter, et al.. (2011). Human Dimensions of Earthworm Invasion in the Adirondack State Park. Human Ecology. 39(5). 641–655. 15 indexed citations
11.
Gill, Nicholas, Peter Klepeis, & Laurie Chisholm. (2010). Stewardship among lifestyle oriented rural landowners. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management. 53(3). 317–334. 116 indexed citations
12.
Chisholm, Laurie, et al.. (2010). Parcel subdivision automation for agent-based land use modelling. Research Online (University of Wollongong). 1–8. 1 indexed citations
13.
Klepeis, Peter, Nicholas Gill, & Laurie Chisholm. (2008). Emerging amenity landscapes: Invasive weeds and land subdivision in rural Australia. Land Use Policy. 26(2). 380–392. 96 indexed citations
14.
Bray, David Barton & Peter Klepeis. (2005). Deforestation, Forest Transitions, and Institutions for Sustainability in Southeastern Mexico, 1900-2000. Environment and History. 11(2). 194–223. 79 indexed citations
15.
Klepeis, Peter. (2003). Development policies and tropical deforestation in the southern Yucatán peninsula: centralized and decentralized approaches. Land Degradation and Development. 14(6). 541–561. 31 indexed citations
16.
Klepeis, Peter & Colin Vance. (2003). Neoliberal Policy and Deforestation in Southeastern Mexico: An Assessment of the PROCAMPO Program. Economic Geography. 79(3). 221–240. 118 indexed citations
17.
Klepeis, Peter & Colin Vance. (2003). Deforestation and Neoliberal Policy in Southeastern Mexico. an Analysis of the PROCAMPO Program. elib (German Aerospace Center). 2 indexed citations
18.
Geoghegan, Jacqueline, Sergio Cortina-Villar, Peter Klepeis, et al.. (2001). Modeling tropical deforestation in the southern Yucatán peninsular region: comparing survey and satellite data. Agriculture Ecosystems & Environment. 85(1-3). 25–46. 210 indexed citations
19.
Klepeis, Peter & B. L. Turner. (2001). Integrated land history and global change science:. Land Use Policy. 18(1). 27–39. 83 indexed citations
20.
Klepeis, Peter. (2000). Deforesting the once deforested: land transformation in southeastern Mexico.. 17 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026