Peter K. Schott

16.9k total citations · 6 hit papers
88 papers, 7.4k citations indexed

About

Peter K. Schott is a scholar working on General Economics, Econometrics and Finance, Economics and Econometrics and Strategy and Management. According to data from OpenAlex, Peter K. Schott has authored 88 papers receiving a total of 7.4k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 66 papers in General Economics, Econometrics and Finance, 52 papers in Economics and Econometrics and 35 papers in Strategy and Management. Recurrent topics in Peter K. Schott's work include Global trade and economics (65 papers), Firm Innovation and Growth (28 papers) and Global Trade and Competitiveness (26 papers). Peter K. Schott is often cited by papers focused on Global trade and economics (65 papers), Firm Innovation and Growth (28 papers) and Global Trade and Competitiveness (26 papers). Peter K. Schott collaborates with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Germany. Peter K. Schott's co-authors include Andrew B. Bernard, Stephen J. Redding, Justin R. Pierce, J. Bradford Jensen, Shang‐Jin Wei, Amit Khandelwal, Juan Carlos Hallak, Edward E. Leamer, Teresa Fort and Andrew Greenland and has published in prestigious journals such as American Economic Review, The Quarterly Journal of Economics and The Journal of Economic Perspectives.

In The Last Decade

Peter K. Schott

85 papers receiving 6.9k citations

Hit Papers

Across-Product Versus Within-Product Specialization in In... 2004 2026 2011 2018 2004 2016 2010 2011 2013 250 500 750

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Peter K. Schott United States 30 5.6k 4.7k 3.3k 623 608 88 7.4k
J. Bradford Jensen United States 28 5.8k 1.0× 4.8k 1.0× 3.7k 1.1× 630 1.0× 665 1.1× 60 7.4k
Stephen J. Redding United States 45 5.3k 0.9× 7.4k 1.6× 2.8k 0.9× 578 0.9× 519 0.9× 115 9.7k
Marc J. Melitz United States 21 6.4k 1.1× 5.4k 1.1× 3.6k 1.1× 864 1.4× 636 1.0× 40 8.0k
Pinelopi Goldberg United States 27 3.9k 0.7× 4.6k 1.0× 1.6k 0.5× 639 1.0× 374 0.6× 70 6.6k
Jozef Konings Belgium 30 3.2k 0.6× 3.4k 0.7× 2.0k 0.6× 494 0.8× 679 1.1× 113 5.1k
Holger Görg Germany 49 5.8k 1.0× 6.2k 1.3× 5.3k 1.6× 545 0.9× 1.6k 2.7× 279 9.6k
Thierry Mayer France 35 4.0k 0.7× 3.7k 0.8× 2.6k 0.8× 712 1.1× 541 0.9× 95 6.6k
Sourafel Girma United Kingdom 40 3.0k 0.5× 3.5k 0.7× 3.0k 0.9× 390 0.6× 1.5k 2.5× 133 5.8k
Keith Head Canada 29 4.2k 0.7× 3.7k 0.8× 2.9k 0.9× 483 0.8× 686 1.1× 65 6.0k
Aaditya Mattoo United States 40 3.0k 0.5× 2.7k 0.6× 1.9k 0.6× 413 0.7× 236 0.4× 214 5.6k

Countries citing papers authored by Peter K. Schott

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Peter K. Schott's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Peter K. Schott with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Peter K. Schott more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Peter K. Schott

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Peter K. Schott. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Peter K. Schott. The network helps show where Peter K. Schott may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Peter K. Schott

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Peter K. Schott. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Peter K. Schott based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Peter K. Schott. Peter K. Schott is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Greenland, Andrew, Mihai Ion, John Lopresti, & Peter K. Schott. (2024). Using equity market reactions to infer exposure to trade liberalization. Journal of International Economics. 152. 104000–104000. 2 indexed citations
2.
Heise, Sebastian, Justin R. Pierce, Georg Schaur, & Peter K. Schott. (2024). Tariff Rate Uncertainty and the Structure of Supply Chains. SSRN Electronic Journal.
3.
Alfaro, Laura, Anusha Chari, Andrew Greenland, & Peter K. Schott. (2020). Aggregate and Firm-Level Stock Returns During Pandemics, in Real Time. National Bureau of Economic Research. 29 indexed citations
4.
Pierce, Justin R. & Peter K. Schott. (2017). Investment Responses to Trade Liberalization: Evidence from U.S. Industries and Establishments. Finance and Economics Discussion Series. 2017.0(120). 2 indexed citations
5.
Pierce, Justin R. & Peter K. Schott. (2016). Trade Liberalization and Mortality: Evidence from U.S. Counties. Finance and Economics Discussion Series. 2016.0(94). 12 indexed citations
6.
Schott, Peter K., et al.. (2015). Context Specific Complexity Management - A recommendation model for optimal corporate complexity. 10(2). 32–46. 2 indexed citations
7.
Pierce, Justin R. & Peter K. Schott. (2012). Concording U.S. Harmonized System Codes over Time. Journal of Official Statistics. 28(1). 53–68. 47 indexed citations
8.
Bernard, Andrew B., J. Bradford Jensen, Stephen J. Redding, & Peter K. Schott. (2012). The Empirics of Firm Heterogeneity and International Trade. Annual Review of Economics. 4(1). 283–313. 307 indexed citations breakdown →
9.
Schott, Peter K.. (2010). U.S. Manufacturing Exports and Imports by SIC or NAICS Category and Partner Country, 1972 to 2005. 49 indexed citations
10.
Bernard, Andrew B., Raymond Robertson, & Peter K. Schott. (2010). Is Mexico a Lumpy Country?. Review of International Economics. 18(5). 937–950. 13 indexed citations
11.
Hallak, Juan Carlos & Peter K. Schott. (2009). Technical Appendix for “Estimating Cross-Country Differences in Product Quality”.
12.
Bernard, Andrew B., J. Bradford Jensen, Stephen J. Redding, & Peter K. Schott. (2009). The Margins of US Trade. American Economic Review. 99(2). 487–493. 218 indexed citations
13.
Hallak, Juan Carlos & Peter K. Schott. (2008). Estimating Cross-Country Differences in Product Quality. SSRN Electronic Journal. 11 indexed citations
14.
Bernard, Andrew B., J. Bradford Jensen, & Peter K. Schott. (2006). Transfer Pricing by U.S.-Based Multinational Firms. National Bureau of Economic Research. 1 indexed citations
15.
Bernard, Andrew B., J. Bradford Jensen, & Peter K. Schott. (2005). Importers, Exporters, and Multinationals: A Portrait of Firms in the U.S. that Trade Goods. National Bureau of Economic Research. 513–552. 37 indexed citations
16.
Bernard, Andrew B., Stephen J. Redding, & Peter K. Schott. (2005). Multi-Product Firms and the Dynamics of Product Mix∗. 9 indexed citations
17.
Bernard, Andrew B., Stephen J. Redding, & Peter K. Schott. (2004). Comparative Advantage and Heterogenous Firms. SSRN Electronic Journal. 9 indexed citations
18.
Schott, Peter K., J. Bradford Jensen, & Andrew B. Bernard. (2004). How Offshore Work Affects Your Industry. Harvard business review. 82(11). 26–27. 1 indexed citations
19.
Bernard, Andrew B., J. Bradford Jensen, & Peter K. Schott. (2004). Facing the Dragon: Prospects for U.S. Manufacturers in the Coming Decade ♦. 8 indexed citations
20.
Bernard, Andrew B., Stephen J. Redding, & Peter K. Schott. (2001). Factor price equality and the economies of the United States. London School of Economics and Political Science Research Online (London School of Economics and Political Science). 6 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026