Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Agglomeration benefits and location choice: Evidence from Japanese manufacturing investments in the United States
1995732 citationsKeith Head, John Ries et al.Journal of International Economicsprofile →
The erosion of colonial trade linkages after independence
2010675 citationsKeith Head, Thierry Mayer et al.Journal of International Economicsprofile →
Estimating the Knowledge-Capital Model of the Multinational Enterprise: Comment
2003576 citationsBruce A. Blonigen, Ronald B. Davies et al.American Economic Reviewprofile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
This map shows the geographic impact of Keith Head's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Keith Head with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Keith Head more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Keith Head. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Keith Head. The network helps show where Keith Head may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Keith Head
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Keith Head.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Keith Head based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Keith Head. Keith Head is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Head, Keith, Thierry Mayer, & Marc J. Melitz. (2024). The Laffer curve for rules of origin. Journal of International Economics. 150. 103911–103911.1 indexed citations
Head, Keith, Yao Amber Li, & Asier Minondo. (2018). Geography, Ties and Knowledge Flows: Evidence from Citations in Mathematics. CEP Discussion Paper No. 1554..
Head, Keith, Thierry Mayer, & Mathias Thoenig. (2014). Welfare and Trade Without Pareto. SPIRE - Sciences Po Institutional REpository.4 indexed citations
10.
Head, Keith & Thierry Mayer. (2013). GRAVITY EQUATIONS: WORKHORSE, TOOLKIT, AND COOKBOOK. SPIRE - Sciences Po Institutional REpository.45 indexed citations
11.
Chandra, Ambarish, Keith Head, & Mariano Tappata. (2013). The Economics of Cross-Border Travel. The Review of Economics and Statistics. 96(4). 648–661.49 indexed citations
12.
Head, Keith, et al.. (2010). FROM BEIJING TO BENTONVILLE: DO MULTINATIONAL RETAILERS LINK MARKETS?. SSRN Electronic Journal.2 indexed citations
Head, Keith, John Ries, & Thierry Mayer. (2007). 2010) “The Erosion of Colonial Trade Linkages After Independence. SPIRE - Sciences Po Institutional REpository.4 indexed citations
Blonigen, Bruce A., Ronald B. Davies, & Keith Head. (2003). Estimating the Knowledge-Capital Model of the Multinational Enterprise: Comment. American Economic Review. 93(3). 980–994.576 indexed citations breakdown →
Head, Keith & Thierry Mayer. (2000). Non-Europe: The Magnitude and Causes of Market Fragmentation in the EU.: The Magnitude and Causes of Market Fragmentation in the EU.. 136(2). 284.31 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.