Peter K. Chiang

3.7k citations
96 papers · 2.9k · h-index 29

Impact in

Papers in

Peter K. Chiang

96 papers receiving 2.7k citations

Peers

Peter K. Chiang
Comparison fields: 5 of 119
  • Physiology 226
  • Rheumatology 451
  • Biochemistry 183
  • Molecular Biology 1.7k
  • Clinical Biochemistry 125
Replace George S. Johnson with:
George S. Johnson United States
Thierry de Barsy Belgium
Erwin Knecht Spain
Bruno Maras Italy
Nathan N. Aronson United States
R. T. BORCHARDT United States
N.H. Keep United Kingdom
Paul Jenö Switzerland
Michael A. Chirigos United States
Mari Kono United States
Peter K. Chiang relative to George S. Johnson United States George S. Johnson's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×13.5×
George S. Johnson · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Peter K. Chiang

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Peter K. Chiang's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Peter K. Chiang with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Peter K. Chiang more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Peter K. Chiang

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Peter K. Chiang. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Peter K. Chiang. The network helps show where Peter K. Chiang may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Peter K. Chiang, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Peter K. Chiang Line = papers co-authored together Peter K. Chiang links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 96 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1998175
2 1977153
3 1979147
4 1981130
5 1986130
6 1982124
7 198495
8 200691
9 197891
10 200886
11 198168
12 201167
13 200266
14 199765
15 197863
16 198161
17 198157
18 198057
19 200353
20 197853

About Peter K. Chiang

Peter K. Chiang is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Pharmacology, Epidemiology and Organic Chemistry, having authored 96 papers that have together received 2.9k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Biochemical and Molecular Research (18 papers), Folate and B Vitamins Research (11 papers), HIV/AIDS drug development and treatment (10 papers), Receptor Mechanisms and Signaling (9 papers), Cholinesterase and Neurodegenerative Diseases (9 papers), Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (7 papers), Adenosine and Purinergic Signaling (6 papers) and RNA modifications and cancer (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Physiology (226 citations), Rheumatology (451 citations), Biochemistry (183 citations), Molecular Biology (1.7k citations) and Clinical Biochemistry (125 citations). Peter K. Chiang has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Canada and Poland. Frequent co-authors include Giulio L. Cantoni, Andrzej Guranowski, John A. Montgomery, Richard K. Gordon, Henry H. Richards, John P. Bader, Janusz M. Bujnicki, Duy H. Hua, H. Jeanette Thomas and Jeffrey E. Segall. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Medicinal Chemistry, Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications, Biochemical Pharmacology, Analytical Biochemistry and Advances in experimental medicine and biology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact