Peter J. Craig

24 total papers · 874 total citations
17 papers, 706 citations indexed

About

Peter J. Craig is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience and Neurology. According to data from OpenAlex, Peter J. Craig has authored 17 papers receiving a total of 706 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 16 papers in Molecular Biology, 11 papers in Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience and 2 papers in Neurology. Recurrent topics in Peter J. Craig's work include Ion channel regulation and function (11 papers), Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (9 papers) and Nicotinic Acetylcholine Receptors Study (8 papers). Peter J. Craig is often cited by papers focused on Ion channel regulation and function (11 papers), Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (9 papers) and Nicotinic Acetylcholine Receptors Study (8 papers). Peter J. Craig collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and France. Peter J. Craig's co-authors include Stephen G. Volsen, Robert Beattie, Alison L. McCormack, William K. Smith, Edward Perez‐Reyes, Emanuele Sher, Pamela J. Shaw, Paul G. Ince, Michael M. Harpold and Nicola C. Day and has published in prestigious journals such as The Journal of Physiology, The Journal of Comparative Neurology and Neuroscience.

In The Last Decade

Peter J. Craig

17 papers receiving 692 citations

Author Peers

Peers are selected by citation overlap in the author's most active subfields. citations · hero ref

Author Last Decade Papers Cites
Peter J. Craig 569 440 89 72 52 17 706
Takashi Sakagawa 462 0.8× 506 1.1× 128 1.4× 113 1.6× 58 1.1× 13 801
Teresa K. Aman 464 0.8× 470 1.1× 93 1.0× 40 0.6× 58 1.1× 19 696
Georg Wietzorrek 500 0.9× 361 0.8× 155 1.7× 77 1.1× 73 1.4× 22 787
Ruslan I. Stanika 447 0.8× 421 1.0× 41 0.5× 88 1.2× 111 2.1× 22 731
John B. Denny 374 0.7× 266 0.6× 113 1.3× 45 0.6× 68 1.3× 16 646
Lesley A. Colgan 486 0.9× 447 1.0× 33 0.4× 41 0.6× 59 1.1× 18 809
Keshava N. Kumar 477 0.8× 445 1.0× 32 0.4× 93 1.3× 111 2.1× 22 791
Lucas Matt 575 1.0× 526 1.2× 108 1.2× 69 1.0× 123 2.4× 23 874
A Ambrosini 653 1.1× 526 1.2× 59 0.7× 42 0.6× 102 2.0× 24 883
Katiuscia Martinello 298 0.5× 377 0.9× 36 0.4× 102 1.4× 68 1.3× 26 649

Countries citing papers authored by Peter J. Craig

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Peter J. Craig's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Peter J. Craig with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Peter J. Craig more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Peter J. Craig

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Peter J. Craig. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Peter J. Craig. The network helps show where Peter J. Craig may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Peter J. Craig

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Peter J. Craig. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Peter J. Craig based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Peter J. Craig. Peter J. Craig is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Loading papers...

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026