Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Bose–Einstein condensation on a microelectronic chip
2001468 citationsPeter Hommelhoff et al.Natureprofile →
Attosecond control of electrons emitted from a nanoscale metal tip
2011432 citationsPeter Hommelhoff et al.Natureprofile →
Light-field-driven currents in graphene
2017298 citationsPeter Hommelhoff et al.Natureprofile →
Author Peers
Peers are selected by citation overlap in the author's most active subfields.
citations ·
hero ref
Countries citing papers authored by Peter Hommelhoff
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Peter Hommelhoff's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Peter Hommelhoff with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Peter Hommelhoff more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Peter Hommelhoff
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Peter Hommelhoff. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Peter Hommelhoff. The network helps show where Peter Hommelhoff may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Peter Hommelhoff
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Peter Hommelhoff.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Peter Hommelhoff based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Peter Hommelhoff. Peter Hommelhoff is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Meier, Stefan, et al.. (2023). Strong-field electron emission from gold needle tips. Journal of Vacuum Science & Technology B Nanotechnology and Microelectronics Materials Processing Measurement and Phenomena. 41(5).5 indexed citations
Krohn, David, Trevor MacDougall, Alexis Méndez, Peter Hommelhoff, & Matthias F. Kling. (2015). New titles at a glance. Nature Photonics. 9(2). 74–74.1 indexed citations
11.
Hommelhoff, Peter. (2014). Die Societas Unius Personae: als Konzernbaustein momentan noch unbrauchbar. 1065–1074.1 indexed citations
Hommelhoff, Peter, et al.. (2008). Eine GmbH für Europa: Der Vorschlag der EU-Kommission zur Societas Privata Europaea (SPE). 897–911.1 indexed citations
15.
Hommelhoff, Peter, et al.. (2000). Festschrift für Marcus Lutter zum 70. Geburtstag.1 indexed citations
16.
Hommelhoff, Peter, et al.. (2000). Handbuch des Kapitalersatzrechts.1 indexed citations
17.
Hommelhoff, Peter, Peter-Christian Müller-Graff, & Peter Ulmer. (1999). Die Praxis der rechtsberatenden Berufe. C.H.Beck eBooks.
18.
Hommelhoff, Peter, et al.. (1996). Corporate Governance : Optimierung der Unternehmensführung und der Unternehmenskontrolle im deutschen und amerikanischen Aktienrecht.2 indexed citations
19.
Hommelhoff, Peter. (1992). Zivilrecht unter dem Einfluss europäischer Rechtsangleichung. Archiv für die civilistische Praxis. 192(1). 71–107.1 indexed citations
20.
Hommelhoff, Peter. (1982). Die Konzernleitungspflicht : zentrale Aspekte eines Konzernverfassungsrechts.1 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.