Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Learning to evolve
20041.2k citationsPeter Hines, Nick Rich et al.International Journal of Operations & Production Managementprofile →
The seven value stream mapping tools
1997637 citationsPeter Hines, Nick RichInternational Journal of Operations & Production Managementprofile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
This map shows the geographic impact of Peter Hines's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Peter Hines with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Peter Hines more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Peter Hines. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Peter Hines. The network helps show where Peter Hines may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Peter Hines
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Peter Hines.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Peter Hines based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Peter Hines. Peter Hines is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Åhlström, Pär, Pamela Danese, Peter Hines, et al.. (2021). Is lean a theory? Viewpoints and outlook. International Journal of Operations & Production Management. 41(12). 1852–1878.45 indexed citations
Silvi, Riccardo, et al.. (2008). SCM and lean thinking: a framework for management accounting. Journal of cost management. 22(1). 11–20.5 indexed citations
15.
Hines, Peter, et al.. (2007). Demand Chain Management: An Integrative Approach in Automotive Retailing. SSRN Electronic Journal.1 indexed citations
16.
Collins, Andrea, et al.. (2005). Reducing the Welsh footprint - A contribution to UNEP's 10 year framework of programmes on sustainable production and consumption. ORCA Online Research @Cardiff (Cardiff University).1 indexed citations
17.
Hines, Peter, Richard Lamming, Dan Jones, Paul D. Cousins, & Nick Rich. (2000). Value stream management: strategy and excellence in the supply chain. ePrints Soton (University of Southampton).102 indexed citations
18.
Hines, Peter, et al.. (1997). The lean enterprise : designing and managing strategic processes for customer-winning performance.25 indexed citations
19.
Hines, Peter. (1994). Creating world class suppliers : unlocking mutual competitive advantage. Pitman eBooks.182 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.