Peter H. Knapp
- Clinical Psychology top 2%
- Psychiatry and Mental health top 2%
- Social Psychology top 5%
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology top 5%
- Philosophy top 0.5%
- Co-authors
- Arlene FrankJohn G. GundersonAleksander A. MathéMarsha VannicelliJames P. FroschElinor M. LevyPaul H. BlackMartin Jacobs
- Topics
- Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications (12 papers)Asthma and respiratory diseases (7 papers)Mental Health and Psychiatry (6 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesSwitzerlandAustralia
In The Last Decade
Peter H. Knapp
55 papers receiving 1.6k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 135
- Clinical Psychology 770
- Psychiatry and Mental health 482
- Social Psychology 364
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 336
- Philosophy 314
Countries citing papers authored by Peter H. Knapp
This map shows the geographic impact of Peter H. Knapp's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Peter H. Knapp with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Peter H. Knapp more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Peter H. Knapp
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Peter H. Knapp. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Peter H. Knapp. The network helps show where Peter H. Knapp may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Peter H. Knapp
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Peter H. Knapp. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Peter H. Knapp based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Peter H. Knapp. Peter H. Knapp is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 50 | |
| 2 | 26 | |
| 3 | 57 | |
| 4 | 5 | |
| 5 | 14 | |
| 6 | Psychological factors immunological function and bronchial asthma | 10 |
| 7 | 1 | |
| 8 | 15 | |
| 9 | 4 | |
| 10 | 1 | |
| 11 | 63 | |
| 12 | 3 | |
| 13 | 19 | |
| 14 | 150 | |
| 15 | 18 | |
| 16 | 34 | |
| 17 | 20 | |
| 18 | Expression of the emotions in manbreakdown → | 384 |
| 19 | 5 | |
| 20 | 19 |
About Peter H. Knapp
Peter H. Knapp is a scholar working on General Psychology, Behavioral Neuroscience and Clinical Psychology, having authored 58 papers that have together received 2.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications (12 papers), Asthma and respiratory diseases (7 papers) and Mental Health and Psychiatry (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in General Psychology (99 citations), Behavioral Neuroscience (144 citations) and Clinical Psychology (770 citations). Peter H. Knapp has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Switzerland and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Arlene Frank, John G. Gunderson, Aleksander A. Mathé, Marsha Vannicelli, James P. Frosch, Elinor M. Levy, Paul H. Black, Martin Jacobs, Timothy Heeren and B. H. Fox. Their work appears in journals such as New England Journal of Medicine, American Journal of Psychiatry and Schizophrenia Bulletin.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.