Peter Graefe

416 citations
34 papers · 181 indexed · h-index 8

Impact in

Papers in

Peter Graefe

31 papers receiving 147 citations

Peers

Peter Graefe
Comparison fields: 5 of 49
  • Public Administration 33
  • Urban Studies 46
  • Political Science and International Relations 84
  • Finance 36
  • Business and International Management 5
Replace Didier Chabanet with:
Didier Chabanet France
Maxim Bolt United Kingdom
Édith Archambault France
Jean-Louis Laville France
Birgit Mahnkopf Germany
Alan Hirsch South Africa
Rebecca Prentice United Kingdom
Jadwiga Staniszkis Poland
Marc Smyrl France
Christoph Ellersgaard Denmark
Peter Graefe relative to Didier Chabanet France Didier Chabanet's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.3×
Didier Chabanet · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Peter Graefe

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Peter Graefe's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Peter Graefe with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Peter Graefe more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Peter Graefe

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Peter Graefe. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Peter Graefe. The network helps show where Peter Graefe may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network

The 12 scholars most cited alongside Peter Graefe, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Peter Graefe Line = papers co-authored together Peter Graefe links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 20250
2 20242
3 20235
4 20227
5 20161
6 201311
7
The Toronto Origins of Ontario’s 2008 Poverty Reduction Strategy: Mobilizing Multiple Channels of Influence for Progressive Social Policy Change
20124
8 20102
9
The Labor of the Multitude and the Fabric of Biopolitics
200815
10 20075
11 200615
12 20067
13 200415
14 20045
15 20044
16 20028
17 20020
18
Building Citizenship: Governance and Service Provision in Canada. CPRN Discussion Paper.
20011
19 20017
20 19992

About Peter Graefe

Peter Graefe is a scholar working on Urban Studies, Public Administration, Political Science and International Relations, Finance and Sociology and Political Science, having authored 34 papers that have together received 181 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Social Policy and Reform Studies (13 papers), Social Sciences and Governance (13 papers), Healthcare innovation and challenges (6 papers), Social Policies and Family (6 papers), Electoral Systems and Political Participation (4 papers), Canadian Identity and History (4 papers), Political Systems and Governance (4 papers) and Canadian Policy and Governance (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Public Administration (33 citations), Urban Studies (46 citations), Political Science and International Relations (84 citations), Finance (36 citations) and Business and International Management (5 citations). Peter Graefe has collaborated with scholars based in Canada. Frequent co-authors include Jean-Marc Fontan, Sara Mayo‐Prieto, Éric Shragge, Mark Coté, Antonio Negri, Linda A. White, A. N. Bourns, Keith Banting, Jane Jenson and Jean Harvey. Their work appears in journals such as Studies in Political Economy, Canadian Public Policy, Canadian Review of Sociology/Revue canadienne de sociologie, Policy and Society and Sociétés contemporaines.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026