Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Challenges and Future Directions of Big Data and Artificial Intelligence in Education
This map shows the geographic impact of Peter Géczy's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Peter Géczy with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Peter Géczy more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Peter Géczy. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Peter Géczy. The network helps show where Peter Géczy may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Peter Géczy
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Peter Géczy.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Peter Géczy based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Peter Géczy. Peter Géczy is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Géczy, Peter. (2015). Big Data Management: Relational Framework. SSRN Electronic Journal. 6(3). 21.4 indexed citations
Géczy, Peter. (2009). Human Behavior and Interactions in Web Environments.. International Conference on Enterprise Information Systems. 5–6.1 indexed citations
Géczy, Peter & Shiro Usui. (2000). Superlinear Conjugate GradientMethod with Adaptable Step Length Step Length and Constant Momentum erm. IEICE Transactions on Fundamentals of Electronics Communications and Computer Sciences. 83(11). 2320–2328.2 indexed citations
13.
Géczy, Peter & Shiro Usui. (2000). Novel First Order Optimization Classification Framework. IEICE Transactions on Fundamentals of Electronics Communications and Computer Sciences. 83(11). 2312–2319.1 indexed citations
14.
Géczy, Peter & Shiro Usui. (1998). Theoretical Concept of Network Pruning Based on Functional Convergence. International Conference on Neural Information Processing. 635–638.
15.
Géczy, Peter & Shiro Usui. (1998). Dynamic Sample Selection: Implementation. IEICE Transactions on Fundamentals of Electronics Communications and Computer Sciences. 81(9). 1940–1947.2 indexed citations
16.
Géczy, Peter & Shiro Usui. (1998). Theoretical Analysis and Classification of Training Problem in Neural Networks. International Conference on Neural Information Processing. 1381–1384.1 indexed citations
17.
Géczy, Peter & Shiro Usui. (1998). Dynamic Sample Selection : Theory. IEICE Transactions on Fundamentals of Electronics Communications and Computer Sciences. 81(9). 1931–1939.3 indexed citations
Géczy, Peter & Shiro Usui. (1997). Rule Extraction from Trained Artificial Neural Networks.. International Conference on Neural Information Processing. 835–838.16 indexed citations
20.
Géczy, Peter & Shiro Usui. (1995). PROBLEM OF RANK-DEFICIENCIES OF A JACOBEAN FOR A NEURAL NETWORK. Natural Computing. 95(405). 7–14.1 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.