Peter Gates
Impact in
-
- Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
- Neuroscience and Neural Engineering
- Photoreceptor and optogenetics research
- Sensory Systems top 5%
Papers in
-
- Ion channel regulation and function 9
- Connexins and lens biology 4
- Nicotinic Acetylcholine Receptors Study 2
-
- Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research 2
- Neuroscience and Neural Engineering 1
- Co-authors
- Kim Cooper (8 shared papers)James L. Rae (7 shared papers)Mitchell A. Watsky (1 shared paper)Bob Eisenberg (4 shared papers)Jerry Dewey (3 shared papers)
- Journals
- The Journal of Membrane Biology (4 papers)Experimental Eye Research (1 paper)Progress in Biophysics and Molecular Biology (1 paper)Current Eye Research (1 paper)Quarterly Reviews of Biophysics (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
Peter Gates
10 papers receiving 1.0k citations
Peter Gates's Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 84
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 570
- Sensory Systems 87
- Endocrine and Autonomic Systems 76
- Molecular Biology 799
- Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 212
Countries citing papers authored by Peter Gates
This map shows the geographic impact of Peter Gates's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Peter Gates with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Peter Gates more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Peter Gates
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Peter Gates. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Peter Gates. The network helps show where Peter Gates may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 5 scholars most cited alongside Peter Gates, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Low access resistance perforated patch recordings using amphotericin B Hit paper breakdown → | 1991 | 815 |
| 2 | 1988 | 68 | |
| 3 | 1988 | 43 | |
| 4 | 1990 | 28 | |
| 5 | 1990 | 28 | |
| 6 | 1989 | 23 | |
| 7 | 1989 | 19 | |
| 8 | 1989 | 17 | |
| 9 | 1990 | 14 | |
| 10 | 1990 | 3 |
About Peter Gates
Peter Gates is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Statistical and Nonlinear Physics, Biomedical Engineering and Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, having authored 10 papers that have together received 1.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Ion channel regulation and function (9 papers), Connexins and lens biology (4 papers), stochastic dynamics and bifurcation (3 papers), Nanopore and Nanochannel Transport Studies (2 papers), Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (2 papers), Nicotinic Acetylcholine Receptors Study (2 papers), Neuroscience and Neural Engineering (1 paper) and Intraocular Surgery and Lenses (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (570 citations), Sensory Systems (87 citations), Endocrine and Autonomic Systems (76 citations), Molecular Biology (799 citations) and Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (212 citations). Peter Gates has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Kim Cooper, James L. Rae, Mitchell A. Watsky, Bob Eisenberg and Jerry Dewey. Their work appears in journals such as The Journal of Membrane Biology, Experimental Eye Research, Progress in Biophysics and Molecular Biology, Current Eye Research and Quarterly Reviews of Biophysics.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.