Peter Gates

1.2k total citations · 1 hit paper
10 papers, 1.1k citations indexed

About

Peter Gates is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience and Statistical and Nonlinear Physics. According to data from OpenAlex, Peter Gates has authored 10 papers receiving a total of 1.1k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 9 papers in Molecular Biology, 4 papers in Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience and 3 papers in Statistical and Nonlinear Physics. Recurrent topics in Peter Gates's work include Ion channel regulation and function (9 papers), Connexins and lens biology (4 papers) and stochastic dynamics and bifurcation (3 papers). Peter Gates is often cited by papers focused on Ion channel regulation and function (9 papers), Connexins and lens biology (4 papers) and stochastic dynamics and bifurcation (3 papers). Peter Gates collaborates with scholars based in United States. Peter Gates's co-authors include Kim Cooper, James L. Rae, Mitchell A. Watsky, Bob Eisenberg and Jerry Dewey and has published in prestigious journals such as Experimental Eye Research, Quarterly Reviews of Biophysics and The Journal of Membrane Biology.

In The Last Decade

Peter Gates

10 papers receiving 1.0k citations

Hit Papers

Low access resistance perforated patch recordings using a... 1991 2026 2002 2014 1991 250 500 750

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Peter Gates United States 9 826 588 219 92 90 10 1.1k
Kim Cooper United States 15 955 1.2× 622 1.1× 239 1.1× 103 1.1× 93 1.0× 20 1.2k
B S Pallotta United States 13 1.8k 2.2× 1.3k 2.3× 689 3.1× 104 1.1× 89 1.0× 20 2.0k
Bertil Hille United States 11 862 1.0× 681 1.2× 198 0.9× 89 1.0× 58 0.6× 11 1.1k
Y. Lass Israel 19 743 0.9× 672 1.1× 269 1.2× 50 0.5× 23 0.3× 37 1.2k
K Kamino Japan 19 434 0.5× 887 1.5× 188 0.9× 29 0.3× 79 0.9× 33 1.2k
F. Ramón United States 16 462 0.6× 394 0.7× 121 0.6× 61 0.7× 16 0.2× 31 816
C. L. Schauf United States 24 908 1.1× 1.1k 1.9× 166 0.8× 120 1.3× 39 0.4× 69 1.9k
S. I. Helman United States 24 1.3k 1.6× 433 0.7× 97 0.4× 125 1.4× 100 1.1× 51 1.6k
A Ferroni Italy 17 1.1k 1.3× 734 1.2× 581 2.7× 84 0.9× 42 0.5× 49 1.4k
P A Pappone United States 18 760 0.9× 409 0.7× 178 0.8× 242 2.6× 35 0.4× 25 1.0k

Countries citing papers authored by Peter Gates

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Peter Gates's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Peter Gates with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Peter Gates more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Peter Gates

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Peter Gates. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Peter Gates. The network helps show where Peter Gates may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Peter Gates

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Peter Gates. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Peter Gates based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Peter Gates. Peter Gates is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

10 of 10 papers shown
1.
Rae, James L., Kim Cooper, Peter Gates, & Mitchell A. Watsky. (1991). Low access resistance perforated patch recordings using amphotericin B. Journal of Neuroscience Methods. 37(1). 15–26. 813 indexed citations breakdown →
2.
Rae, James L., Jerry Dewey, Kim Cooper, & Peter Gates. (1990). Potassium channel in rabbit corneal endothelium activated by external anions. The Journal of Membrane Biology. 114(1). 29–36. 14 indexed citations
3.
Cooper, Kim, Peter Gates, James L. Rae, & Jerry Dewey. (1990). Electrophysiology of cultured human lens epithelial cells. The Journal of Membrane Biology. 117(3). 285–298. 28 indexed citations
4.
Gates, Peter, Kim Cooper, & Bob Eisenberg. (1990). Analytical Diffusion Models for Membrane Channels. PubMed. 2. 223–281. 3 indexed citations
5.
Rae, James L., Jerry Dewey, Kim Cooper, & Peter Gates. (1990). A non-selective cation channel in rabbit corneal endothelium activated by internal calcium and inhibited by internal ATP. Experimental Eye Research. 50(4). 373–384. 28 indexed citations
6.
Gates, Peter, Kim Cooper, James L. Rae, & Bob Eisenberg. (1989). Predictions of diffusion models for one-ion membrane channels. Progress in Biophysics and Molecular Biology. 53(3). 153–196. 23 indexed citations
7.
Cooper, Kim, James L. Rae, & Peter Gates. (1989). Membrane and junctional properties of dissociated frog lens epithelial cells. The Journal of Membrane Biology. 111(3). 215–227. 19 indexed citations
8.
Rae, James L., et al.. (1989). Dye and electrical coupling between cells of the rabbit corneal endothelium. Current Eye Research. 8(8). 859–869. 17 indexed citations
9.
Gates, Peter, et al.. (1988). Surmounting barriers in ionic channels. Quarterly Reviews of Biophysics. 21(3). 331–364. 43 indexed citations
10.
Gates, Peter, et al.. (1988). Diffusion theory and discrete rate constants in ion permeation. The Journal of Membrane Biology. 106(2). 95–105. 68 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026