Peter Garcia Webb
About
In The Last Decade
Peter Garcia Webb
6 papers receiving 478 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 77
- Orthopedics and Sports Medicine 307
- Pathology and Forensic Medicine 138
- Physiology 125
- Genetics 101
- Molecular Biology 84
Countries citing papers authored by Peter Garcia Webb
This map shows the geographic impact of Peter Garcia Webb's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Peter Garcia Webb with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Peter Garcia Webb more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Peter Garcia Webb
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Peter Garcia Webb. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Peter Garcia Webb. The network helps show where Peter Garcia Webb may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Peter Garcia Webb
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Peter Garcia Webb. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Peter Garcia Webb based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Peter Garcia Webb. Peter Garcia Webb is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 22 | |
| 2 | 9 | |
| 3 | 13 | |
| 4 | 8 | |
| 5 | 418 | |
| 6 | 34 |
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.