Peter Franken

2.6k citations
68 papers · 1.9k · h-index 19

Impact in

Papers in

Peter Franken

62 papers receiving 1.7k citations

Peers

Peter Franken
Comparison fields: 5 of 107
  • Management Information Systems 389
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 961
  • Statistics and Probability 168
  • Management Science and Operations Research 225
  • Spectroscopy 267
Replace J. T. Lewis with:
J. T. Lewis Ireland
Lester Lipsky United States
T. S. Chihara United States
Haim Shore Israel
A. J. F. Siegert United States
Gustav Doetsch Germany
Gadi Fibich Israel
Henry C. Thacher United States
Christian Ringhofer United States
G. N. Watson United Kingdom
Peter Franken relative to J. T. Lewis Ireland J. T. Lewis's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×6.7×
J. T. Lewis · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Peter Franken

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Peter Franken's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Peter Franken with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Peter Franken more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Peter Franken

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Peter Franken. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Peter Franken. The network helps show where Peter Franken may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Peter Franken, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Peter Franken Line = papers co-authored together Peter Franken links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 68 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1962293
2 1961258
3 1985258
4 1959195
5 196094
6 199292
7 196474
8 199064
9 196457
10 196538
11 196635
12 195932
13 195626
14 199125
15 197124
16 195823
17 195822
18 195822
19 197520
20 198316

About Peter Franken

Peter Franken is a scholar working on Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Aerospace Engineering, Spectroscopy, Biomedical Engineering and Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality, having authored 68 papers that have together received 1.9k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Aerodynamics and Acoustics in Jet Flows (7 papers), Atomic and Subatomic Physics Research (6 papers), Reliability and Maintenance Optimization (5 papers), Acoustic Wave Phenomena Research (5 papers), Advanced NMR Techniques and Applications (4 papers), Quantum, superfluid, helium dynamics (4 papers), Cold Atom Physics and Bose-Einstein Condensates (4 papers) and Noise Effects and Management (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Management Information Systems (389 citations), Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (961 citations), Statistics and Probability (168 citations), Management Science and Operations Research (225 citations) and Spectroscopy (267 citations). Peter Franken has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Germany and Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include John F. Ward, F. D. Colegrove, Michael Bass, Richard H. Sands, Volker Schmidt, V. Ramaswami, Dieter König, R. R. Lewis, Sidney Liebes and Andreas Brandt. Their work appears in journals such as The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, Physical Review Letters, Mathematische Nachrichten, Physics Today and Journal of Applied Probability.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact