Peter Francis
About
In The Last Decade
Peter Francis
7 papers receiving 591 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 66
- Infectious Diseases 508
- Epidemiology 377
- Oncology 102
- Small Animals 80
- Pharmacology 63
Countries citing papers authored by Peter Francis
This map shows the geographic impact of Peter Francis's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Peter Francis with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Peter Francis more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Peter Francis
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Peter Francis. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Peter Francis. The network helps show where Peter Francis may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Peter Francis
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Peter Francis. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Peter Francis based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Peter Francis. Peter Francis is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 0 | |
| 3 | 147 | |
| 4 | 53 | |
| 5 | 113 | |
| 6 | 167 | |
| 7 | 37 | |
| 8 | Approaches to management of fungal infections in cancer patients. | 17 |
| 9 | 79 |
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.