Peter DeBry

645 total citations
11 papers, 490 citations indexed

About

Peter DeBry is a scholar working on Ophthalmology, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging and Pathology and Forensic Medicine. According to data from OpenAlex, Peter DeBry has authored 11 papers receiving a total of 490 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 8 papers in Ophthalmology, 3 papers in Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging and 2 papers in Pathology and Forensic Medicine. Recurrent topics in Peter DeBry's work include Glaucoma and retinal disorders (6 papers), Intraocular Surgery and Lenses (3 papers) and Ophthalmology and Eye Disorders (2 papers). Peter DeBry is often cited by papers focused on Glaucoma and retinal disorders (6 papers), Intraocular Surgery and Lenses (3 papers) and Ophthalmology and Eye Disorders (2 papers). Peter DeBry collaborates with scholars based in United States, Poland and Canada. Peter DeBry's co-authors include Deborah W. Neklason, James E. Metherall, Alan S. Crandall, Randall J. Olson, Rohit Krishna, Richard P. Golden, Mark J. Lucarelli, Randall J. Olson, Peter Bergenske and Gregg Heatley and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of Biological Chemistry, Journal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery and Cornea.

In The Last Decade

Peter DeBry

9 papers receiving 464 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Peter DeBry United States	6	337	209	76	65	61	11	490
Amol D. Kulkarni United States	9	165 0.5×	65 0.3×	120 1.6×	15 0.2×	18 0.3×	21	387
Thordur Sverrisson Iceland	13	678 2.0×	468 2.2×	149 2.0×	9 0.1×	85 1.4×	17	776
Mohammad Hossein Jabbarpoor Bonyadi Iran	13	286 0.8×	162 0.8×	82 1.1×	7 0.1×	26 0.4×	33	353
Jingxue Ma China	12	248 0.7×	213 1.0×	109 1.4×	7 0.1×	30 0.5×	45	418
H. E. Hobbs United Kingdom	9	402 1.2×	38 0.2×	80 1.1×	19 0.3×	35 0.6×	20	585
Yingjie Ma China	12	69 0.2×	18 0.1×	58 0.8×	91 1.4×	30 0.5×	30	304
Mark R. Kelley United States	9	54 0.2×	39 0.2×	190 2.5×	16 0.2×	9 0.1×	23	291
Shaopin Zhu China	10	136 0.4×	79 0.4×	106 1.4×	8 0.1×	19 0.3×	17	282
Joyce Huang United States	10	28 0.1×	26 0.1×	110 1.4×	30 0.5×	22 0.4×	23	308

Countries citing papers authored by Peter DeBry

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Peter DeBry's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Peter DeBry with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Peter DeBry more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Peter DeBry

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Peter DeBry. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Peter DeBry. The network helps show where Peter DeBry may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Peter DeBry

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Peter DeBry. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Peter DeBry based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Peter DeBry. Peter DeBry is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

11 of 11 papers shown

1.

Krishna, Rohit, et al.. (2006). Comparison of Proview phosphene tonometry with Goldmann applanation tonometry. Canadian Journal of Ophthalmology. 41(6). 722–726. 9 indexed citations

2.

DeBry, Peter, et al.. (2006). Comparison of Proview phosphene tonometry with Goldmann applanation tonometry. Canadian Journal of Ophthalmology. 41(6). 722–726.

3.

Golden, Richard P., Rohit Krishna, & Peter DeBry. (2005). Resident Glaucoma Surgical Training in United States Residency Programs. Journal of Glaucoma. 14(3). 219–223. 19 indexed citations

4.

DeBry, Peter. (2002). Incidence of Late-Onset Bleb-Related Complications Following Trabeculectomy With Mitomycin. Archives of Ophthalmology. 120(3). 297–297. 270 indexed citations

5.

Lucarelli, Mark J. & Peter DeBry. (2002). Corneal Ectasia Associated With Massage of Dacryocystoceles. Cornea. 21(4). 419–420. 3 indexed citations

6.

DeBry, Peter. (2001). Considerations for Choosing an Electronic Medical Record for an Ophthalmology Practice. Archives of Ophthalmology. 119(4). 590–590. 13 indexed citations

7.

Bergenske, Peter, et al.. (2000). (VB-101)DOES LASIK AFFECT THE MEASURMENT OF AXIAL LENGTH?. Optometry and Vision Science. 77(SUPPLEMENT). 151–151.

8.

DeBry, Peter. (2000). Manual of Cataract Surgery, 2nd ed. Archives of Ophthalmology. 118(4). 593–593. 1 indexed citations

9.

DeBry, Peter, Randall J. Olson, & Alan S. Crandall. (1998). Comparison of energy required for phaco-chop and divide and conquer phacoemulsification. Journal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery. 24(5). 689–692. 56 indexed citations

10.

Olson, Randall J. & Peter DeBry. (1998). Zinc as a treatment for age-related macular degeneration. The Journal of Trace Elements in Experimental Medicine. 11(2-3). 137–145. 4 indexed citations

11.

DeBry, Peter, et al.. (1997). Role of Multidrug Resistance P-glycoproteins in Cholesterol Esterification. Journal of Biological Chemistry. 272(2). 1026–1031. 115 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact