Peter de Ruiter

1.4k citations
21 papers · 640 · h-index 9

Impact in

Papers in

Peter de Ruiter

19 papers receiving 614 citations

Peers

Peter de Ruiter
Comparison fields: 5 of 68
  • Soil Science 148
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation 180
  • Ecological Modeling 46
  • Radiation 93
  • Ecology 253
Replace Jessica L. Schedlbauer with:
Jessica L. Schedlbauer United States
Petr Pokorný Czechia
Laura C. Feher United States
Andrew Wells New Zealand
Andrzej Kruk Poland
Yonghui Yao China
Jeffrey S. Pippen United States
Lenka Bartošová Czechia
Daniel C. Allen United States
Peter de Ruiter relative to Jessica L. Schedlbauer United States Jessica L. Schedlbauer's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Jessica L. Schedlbauer · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Peter de Ruiter

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Peter de Ruiter's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Peter de Ruiter with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Peter de Ruiter more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Peter de Ruiter

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Peter de Ruiter. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Peter de Ruiter. The network helps show where Peter de Ruiter may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Peter de Ruiter, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Peter de Ruiter Line = papers co-authored together Peter de Ruiter links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 21 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2018230
2 2000156
3 200198
4 201126
5 201426
6 201919
7 202019
8 200718
9 202016
10 20228
11 20198
12 20216
13 20103
14 20092
15 20251
16 20241
17
Kunstkritiek als exact vak?: De kunsthistoricus als criticus : 1960-2005
20151
18 20171
19 20191
20 19790

About Peter de Ruiter

Peter de Ruiter is a scholar working on Radiation, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Nature and Landscape Conservation and Ecology, having authored 21 papers that have together received 640 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Advanced Radiotherapy Techniques (9 papers), Medical Imaging Techniques and Applications (4 papers), Radiation Therapy and Dosimetry (4 papers), Prostate Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment (3 papers), Prostate Cancer Treatment and Research (3 papers), Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (3 papers), Isotope Analysis in Ecology (2 papers) and Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Soil Science (148 citations), Nature and Landscape Conservation (180 citations), Ecological Modeling (46 citations), Radiation (93 citations) and Ecology (253 citations). Peter de Ruiter has collaborated with scholars based in Netherlands, United Kingdom and United States. Frequent co-authors include Andrew D. Barnes, Christoph Scherber, Mary I. O’Connor, Nico Eisenhauer, Jonathan S. Lefcheck, Ulrich Brose, Malte Jochum, M.P.M. Janssen, W.A.M. Didden and Matty P. Berg. Their work appears in journals such as Radiotherapy and Oncology, International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics, Physics and Imaging in Radiation Oncology, Ecology and BioScience.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact