Peter Byck
Impact in
- Soil Science top 5%
- Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics
- Agronomy and Crop Science top 10%
- Ruminant Nutrition and Digestive Physiology
- Bioenergy crop production and management
Papers in
- Ecology 8
- Rangeland and Wildlife Management 6
- Agriculture Sustainability and Environmental Impact 2
-
- Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies 4
- Co-authors
- Steven I. Apfelbaum (6 shared papers)Richard Teague (5 shared papers)Samantha Mosier (3 shared papers)Francisco J. Calderón (1 shared paper)M. Francesca Cotrufo (1 shared paper)W.R. Teague (2 shared papers)Jason E. Rowntree (2 shared papers)Urs P. Kreuter (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Journal of Environmental Management (2 papers)Agronomy Journal (1 paper)Ecosphere (1 paper)Journal of Soil and Water Conservation (1 paper)PeerJ (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United StatesAustraliaCzechia
In The Last Decade
Peter Byck
8 papers receiving 282 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 49
- Soil Science 134
- Agronomy and Crop Science 70
- Forestry 27
- Ecology 170
- Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law 56
Countries citing papers authored by Peter Byck
This map shows the geographic impact of Peter Byck's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Peter Byck with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Peter Byck more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Peter Byck
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Peter Byck. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Peter Byck. The network helps show where Peter Byck may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 21 scholars most cited alongside Peter Byck, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2016 | 111 | |
| 2 | 2021 | 103 | |
| 3 | 2022 | 23 | |
| 4 | Potential mitigation of midwest grass-finished beef production emissions with soil carbon sequestration in the United States of America | 2016 | 21 |
| 5 | 2021 | 15 | |
| 6 | 2022 | 14 | |
| 7 | 2022 | 8 | |
| 8 | 2024 | 1 |
About Peter Byck
Peter Byck is a scholar working on Ecology, Nature and Landscape Conservation, Soil Science, Process Chemistry and Technology and Agronomy and Crop Science, having authored 8 papers that have together received 296 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Rangeland and Wildlife Management (6 papers), Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (4 papers), Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics (4 papers), Agriculture Sustainability and Environmental Impact (2 papers), Odor and Emission Control Technologies (1 paper), Soil and Water Nutrient Dynamics (1 paper), Botany, Ecology, and Taxonomy Studies (1 paper) and Soil Management and Crop Yield (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Soil Science (134 citations), Agronomy and Crop Science (70 citations), Forestry (27 citations), Ecology (170 citations) and Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law (56 citations). Peter Byck has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Australia and Czechia. Frequent co-authors include Steven I. Apfelbaum, Richard Teague, Samantha Mosier, Francisco J. Calderón, M. Francesca Cotrufo, W.R. Teague, Jason E. Rowntree, Urs P. Kreuter, Christian A. Davies and Mary L. Rasmussen. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Environmental Management, Agronomy Journal, Ecosphere, Journal of Soil and Water Conservation and PeerJ.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.