Peter Byck

447 total citations
8 papers, 296 citations indexed

About

Peter Byck is a scholar working on Ecology, Nature and Landscape Conservation and Soil Science. According to data from OpenAlex, Peter Byck has authored 8 papers receiving a total of 296 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 8 papers in Ecology, 4 papers in Nature and Landscape Conservation and 4 papers in Soil Science. Recurrent topics in Peter Byck's work include Rangeland and Wildlife Management (6 papers), Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics (4 papers) and Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (4 papers). Peter Byck is often cited by papers focused on Rangeland and Wildlife Management (6 papers), Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics (4 papers) and Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (4 papers). Peter Byck collaborates with scholars based in United States, Australia and Czechia. Peter Byck's co-authors include Steven I. Apfelbaum, Richard Teague, Samantha Mosier, Francisco J. Calderón, M. Francesca Cotrufo, Jason E. Rowntree, W.R. Teague, Christian A. Davies, Rattan Lal and Jerry L. Hatfield and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of Environmental Management, Agronomy Journal and Landscape Ecology.

In The Last Decade

Peter Byck

8 papers receiving 282 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Peter Byck United States	7	170	134	70	56	45	8	296
Samantha Mosier United States	7	106 0.6×	137 1.0×	56 0.8×	31 0.6×	28 0.6×	11	251
Cassiano Eduardo Pinto Brazil	10	90 0.5×	104 0.8×	143 2.0×	54 1.0×	22 0.5×	23	296
John Bushell Australia	8	118 0.7×	90 0.7×	136 1.9×	79 1.4×	50 1.1×	11	339
Karina Pulrolnik Brazil	11	73 0.4×	241 1.8×	84 1.2×	27 0.5×	41 0.9×	20	365
Zivanai Tsvuura South Africa	11	142 0.8×	108 0.8×	45 0.6×	59 1.1×	161 3.6×	44	389
Martin Komainda Germany	12	93 0.5×	75 0.6×	175 2.5×	45 0.8×	52 1.2×	44	385
Pascal Carrère France	8	73 0.4×	67 0.5×	70 1.0×	23 0.4×	98 2.2×	16	279
Peter J. O'Reagain Australia	10	136 0.8×	47 0.4×	111 1.6×	108 1.9×	72 1.6×	17	324
Xiaoxia Yang China	13	191 1.1×	229 1.7×	35 0.5×	56 1.0×	94 2.1×	30	463
Rafael de Oliveira Silva United Kingdom	8	133 0.8×	62 0.5×	67 1.0×	47 0.8×	9 0.2×	14	324

Countries citing papers authored by Peter Byck

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Peter Byck's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Peter Byck with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Peter Byck more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Peter Byck

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Peter Byck. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Peter Byck. The network helps show where Peter Byck may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Peter Byck

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Peter Byck. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Peter Byck based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Peter Byck. Peter Byck is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

8 of 8 papers shown

Apfelbaum, Steven I., et al.. (2024). Breeding bird response to adaptive multi‐paddock and continuous grazing practices in Southeastern United States. Ecosphere. 15(12). 1 indexed citations

Apfelbaum, Steven I., et al.. (2022). Vegetation, water infiltration, and soil carbon response to Adaptive Multi-Paddock and Conventional grazing in Southeastern USA ranches. Journal of Environmental Management. 308. 114576–114576. 23 indexed citations

Mosier, Samantha, et al.. (2022). Improvements in soil properties under adaptive multipaddock grazing relative to conventional grazing. Agronomy Journal. 114(4). 2584–2597. 8 indexed citations

Johnson, David C., et al.. (2022). Adaptive multi-paddock grazing management’s influence on soil food web community structure for: increasing pasture forage production, soil organic carbon, and reducing soil respiration rates in southeastern USA ranches. PeerJ. 10. e13750–e13750. 14 indexed citations

Mosier, Samantha, Steven I. Apfelbaum, Peter Byck, et al.. (2021). Adaptive multi-paddock grazing enhances soil carbon and nitrogen stocks and stabilization through mineral association in southeastern U.S. grazing lands. Journal of Environmental Management. 288. 112409–112409. 103 indexed citations

Wang, Fugui, et al.. (2021). Effects of adaptive multiple paddock and continuous grazing on fine-scale spatial patterns of vegetation species and biomass in commercial ranches. Landscape Ecology. 36(9). 2725–2741. 15 indexed citations

Rowntree, Jason E., Rebecca Ryals, Marcia DeLonge, et al.. (2016). Potential mitigation of midwest grass-finished beef production emissions with soil carbon sequestration in the United States of America. Kobra (Universitätsbibliothek Kassel). 4(3). 31–38. 21 indexed citations

Teague, W.R., Steven I. Apfelbaum, Rattan Lal, et al.. (2016). The role of ruminants in reducing agriculture's carbon footprint in North America. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation. 71(2). 156–164. 111 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact