Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
The Body and Society: Men, Women, and Sexual Renunciation in Early Christianity.
This map shows the geographic impact of Peter Brown's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Peter Brown with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Peter Brown more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Peter Brown. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Peter Brown. The network helps show where Peter Brown may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Peter Brown
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Peter Brown.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Peter Brown based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Peter Brown. Peter Brown is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Baab, Karen L., Dean Falk, Peter Brown, et al.. (2015). A re-evaluation of the Down syndrome diagnosis for LB1 (Homo floresiensis).3 indexed citations
5.
Brown, Peter. (2015). Coasts of catastrophe? The incidence and impact of aeolian sand on British medieval coastal communities.. Durham Research Online (Durham University).2 indexed citations
6.
Brown, Peter, et al.. (2013). Computer Law: Drafting and Negotiating Forms and Agreements.
7.
Brown, Peter, et al.. (2010). Development of an All-Sky Video Meteor Network in Southern Ontario, Canada The ASGARD System. 38(1). 25–30.23 indexed citations
8.
Brown, Peter. (2007). Kult świętych : narodziny i rola w chrześcijaństwie łacińskim. Homo Politicus (Academy of Humanities and Economics in Lodz).1 indexed citations
9.
Brown, Peter. (2006). Seeing through the Veil: Optical Theory and Medieval Allegory. Speculum. 463–464.
10.
Brown, Peter, et al.. (2006). The Bulk Density of Meteoroids from Electro-Optical Measurements. 26. 22.1 indexed citations
Brown, Peter. (1998). Mallarmé et l'écriture en mode mineur.1 indexed citations
15.
Brown, Peter, et al.. (1997). "Świat późnego antyku : od Marka Aureliusza do Mahometa", Peter Brown, Warszawa 1991 : [recenzja] / Elżbieta Jastrzębowska.. 36.
Beech, Martin, Peter Brown, & J. Jones. (1995). The Potential Danger to Space Platforms from Meteor Storm Activity. Quarterly journal of the Royal Astronomical Society. 36. 127.19 indexed citations
Brown, Peter, et al.. (1988). A handlist of manuscripts containing Middle English prose in the Additional Collection (10001-12000), British Library, London . And in the Additional Collection (12001-14000), British Library, London.
20.
Brown, Peter, et al.. (1978). "Society and the supernatural: A medieval change", Peter Brown, "Daedalus" 104 (1975), nr 2 : [recenzja] / M. J. G.. 23.10 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.