Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Pathological synchronization in Parkinson's disease: networks, models and treatments
Reduction in subthalamic 8–35 Hz oscillatory activity correlates with clinical improvement in Parkinson's disease
2006652 citationsAndrea A. Kühn, Andreas Kupsch et al.European Journal of Neuroscienceprofile →
High-Frequency Stimulation of the Subthalamic Nucleus Suppresses Oscillatory Activity in Patients with Parkinson's Disease in Parallel with Improvement in Motor Performance
2008625 citationsAndrea A. Kühn, Alek Pogosyan et al.Journal of Neuroscienceprofile →
Event‐related beta desynchronization in human subthalamic nucleus correlates with motor performance
2004576 citationsAndrea A. Kühn, Andreas Kupsch et al.profile →
Technology of deep brain stimulation: current status and future directions
2020517 citationsTipu Z. Aziz, Peter Brown et al.profile →
New insights into the relationship between dopamine, beta oscillations and motor function
This map shows the geographic impact of Peter Brown's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Peter Brown with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Peter Brown more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Peter Brown. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Peter Brown. The network helps show where Peter Brown may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Peter Brown
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Peter Brown.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Peter Brown based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Peter Brown. Peter Brown is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Jha, Ashwani, Thomas Foltynie, Ludvic Zrinzo, et al.. (2010). Characterisation of resting oscillatory cortico-subthalamic connectivity in patients with Parkinson's disease. UCL Discovery (University College London).2 indexed citations
9.
Brown, Peter, et al.. (2009). The most northerly record of the harlequin ladybird (Col., Coccinellidae) in the British Isles.. The Entomologist s monthly magazine. 145. 43–44.3 indexed citations
10.
O’Brien, Margaret, Peter Brown, & Tamara Bibby. (2008). I would rather die”: Attitudes of 16 year-olds towards their future participation in mathematics.4 indexed citations
Brown, Peter, Alek Pogosyan, Stephen Tisch, et al.. (2005). Intra-operative recordings of local field potentials can help localise the subthalamic nucleus in PD. UCL Discovery (University College London).1 indexed citations
16.
Brown, Peter. (2005). The New Darwinism. Natural history. 114(9). 6–20.
17.
Sobolev, Boris, Peter Brown, David Zelt, & S. E. D. Shortt. (2000). Bias inherent in retrospective waiting-time studies: experience from a vascular surgery waiting list.. PubMed Central. 162(13). 1821–2.14 indexed citations
18.
Limousin, Patricia, Peter Brown, J. Marsden, Luc Defebvre, & John C. Rothwell. (1998). Evoked potentials from subthalamic nucleus, internal pallidum and thalamic stimulation in parkinsonian and postural tremor patients. The Journal of Physiology.6 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.