Peter Bing

1.4k citations
25 papers · 296 · h-index 10

Impact in

    • Classical Antiquity Studies
    • Historical and Literary Studies
  • Classics top 2%
    • Byzantine Studies and History

Papers in

    • Classical Antiquity Studies 20
    • Historical, Religious, and Philosophical Studies 9
    • Ancient Mediterranean Archaeology and History 2
    • Ancient and Medieval Archaeology Studies 1

Peter Bing

22 papers receiving 179 citations

Peers

Peter Bing
Comparison fields: 5 of 43
  • Anthropology 224
  • Classics 67
  • Archeology 150
  • Philosophy 54
  • Religious studies 19
Replace Frederick Ahl with:
Frederick Ahl United States
Ruth Scodel Greece
Jerry Clack
William J. Slater Canada
Claude Calame France
Steven Lowenstam United States
Alison Sharrock United Kingdom
Ralph M. Rosen United States
Kenneth J. Reckford United States
Sander M. Goldberg United States
Peter Bing relative to Frederick Ahl United States Frederick Ahl's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.8×
Frederick Ahl · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Peter Bing

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Peter Bing's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Peter Bing with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Peter Bing more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Peter Bing

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Peter Bing. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Peter Bing. The network helps show where Peter Bing may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 4 scholars most cited alongside Peter Bing, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Peter Bing Line = papers co-authored together Peter Bing links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 25 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 198666
2 198846
3 200727
4 198825
5
The Scroll and the Marble: Studies in Reading and Reception in Hellenistic Poetry
200919
6 199518
7 199310
8 200310
9 200910
10 199310
11
Posidippus and the Admiral: Kallikrates of Samos in the Milan Epigrams
20039
12 19909
13
Savage Energies: Lessons of Myth and Ritual in Ancient Greece
20017
14 19906
15 19945
16 19964
17 19884
18 19853
19 20162
20
Medeios of Olynthos, Son of Lampon, and the Iamatika of Posidippus
20022

About Peter Bing

Peter Bing is a scholar working on Anthropology, Archeology, Classics, Philosophy and Sociology and Political Science, having authored 25 papers that have together received 296 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Classical Antiquity Studies (20 papers), Historical, Religious, and Philosophical Studies (9 papers), Byzantine Studies and History (4 papers), Classical Philosophy and Thought (3 papers), Biblical Studies and Interpretation (2 papers), Linguistics and language evolution (2 papers), Ancient Mediterranean Archaeology and History (2 papers) and Ancient and Medieval Archaeology Studies (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Anthropology (224 citations), Classics (67 citations), Archeology (150 citations), Philosophy (54 citations) and Religious studies (19 citations). Peter Bing has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Walter Burkert, Sally Humphreys, Robert Schmiel and Reinhold Merkelbach. Their work appears in journals such as Antike und Abendland, The Classical World, The Journal of Hellenic Studies, Greek, Roman and Byzantine studies and Zeitschrift für Papyrologie und Epigraphik.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact