Peter Bette
About
In The Last Decade
Peter Bette
7 papers receiving 132 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 50
- Infectious Diseases 59
- Immunology 59
- Molecular Biology 52
- Neurology 27
- Oncology 17
Countries citing papers authored by Peter Bette
This map shows the geographic impact of Peter Bette's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Peter Bette with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Peter Bette more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Peter Bette
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Peter Bette. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Peter Bette. The network helps show where Peter Bette may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Peter Bette
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Peter Bette. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Peter Bette based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Peter Bette. Peter Bette is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 13 | |
| 2 | Immortalization of rat hepatocytes by fusion with hepatoma cells. I. Cloning of a hepatocytoma cell line with bile canaliculi. | 14 |
| 3 | 6 | |
| 4 | 48 | |
| 5 | 2 | |
| 6 | 24 | |
| 7 | 28 |
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.