Perpétua Pinto‐do‐Ó
- Genetics top 5%
- Mesenchymal stem cell research 6
- Biomaterials top 5%
- Electrospun Nanofibers in Biomedical Applications 11
-
- Cardiac Fibrosis and Remodeling 6
- Cancer Research top 10%
- Cell Biology top 10%
- Zebrafish Biomedical Research Applications 5
-
- Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine 18
- Cardiac Structural Anomalies and Repair 3
-
- Congenital heart defects research 11
-
- Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation 5
- Co-authors
- Diana S. NascimentoPatrício Soares‐da‐SilvaAna Catarina R. G. FonsecaCassilda PereiraDiogo MosqueiraLeif CarlssonMariana ValenteKarin Richter
- Journals
- Nature Communications (1 paper)The Journal of Experimental Medicine (2 papers)Blood (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- PortugalUnited StatesFrance
In The Last Decade
Perpétua Pinto‐do‐Ó
50 papers receiving 1.7k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 104
- Genetics 223
- Biomaterials 260
- Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 305
- Cancer Research 200
- Cell Biology 205
Countries citing papers authored by Perpétua Pinto‐do‐Ó
This map shows the geographic impact of Perpétua Pinto‐do‐Ó's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Perpétua Pinto‐do‐Ó with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Perpétua Pinto‐do‐Ó more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Perpétua Pinto‐do‐Ó
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Perpétua Pinto‐do‐Ó. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Perpétua Pinto‐do‐Ó. The network helps show where Perpétua Pinto‐do‐Ó may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Perpétua Pinto‐do‐Ó, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2025 | 3 | |
| 2 | 2025 | 4 | |
| 3 | 2023 | 0 | |
| 4 | 2023 | 2 | |
| 5 | 2021 | 44 | |
| 6 | 2021 | 138 | |
| 7 | 2020 | 78 | |
| 8 | 2019 | 9 | |
| 9 | 2019 | 4 | |
| 10 | 2017 | 5 | |
| 11 | 2017 | 57 | |
| 12 | 2017 | 7 | |
| 13 | 2014 | 36 | |
| 14 | 2014 | 9 | |
| 15 | 2013 | 10 | |
| 16 | 2013 | 11 | |
| 17 | 2010 | 40 | |
| 18 | 2003 | 5 | |
| 19 | 2001 | 17 | |
| 20 | 1996 | 15 |
About Perpétua Pinto‐do‐Ó
Perpétua Pinto‐do‐Ó is a scholar working on Biomaterials, Genetics and Aging, having authored 52 papers that have together received 1.7k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine (18 papers), Congenital heart defects research (11 papers), Electrospun Nanofibers in Biomedical Applications (11 papers), Mesenchymal stem cell research (6 papers), Cardiac Fibrosis and Remodeling (6 papers), Zebrafish Biomedical Research Applications (5 papers), Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation (5 papers) and Cardiac Structural Anomalies and Repair (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Genetics (223 citations), Biomaterials (260 citations) and Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (305 citations). Perpétua Pinto‐do‐Ó has collaborated with scholars based in Portugal, United States and France. Frequent co-authors include Diana S. Nascimento, Patrício Soares‐da‐Silva, Ana Catarina R. G. Fonseca, Cassilda Pereira, Diogo Mosqueira, Leif Carlsson, Mariana Valente, Karin Richter, Ana Cumano and Lino Ferreira. Their work appears in journals such as Nature Communications, The Journal of Experimental Medicine and Blood.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.