Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Grazing vs. mowing: A meta-analysis of biodiversity benefits for grassland management
2016261 citationsMalin Tälle, Lars Westerberg et al.profile →
Author Peers
Peers are selected by citation overlap in the author's most active subfields.
citations ·
hero ref
This map shows the geographic impact of Per Milberg's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Per Milberg with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Per Milberg more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Per Milberg. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Per Milberg. The network helps show where Per Milberg may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Per Milberg
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Per Milberg.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Per Milberg based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Per Milberg. Per Milberg is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Bergstedt, Johan, et al.. (2017). Förändringar i Eklandskapet 1927 till 2013: i den första riksskogstaxeringens fotspår. KTH Publication Database DiVA (KTH Royal Institute of Technology). 111(6). 331–343.3 indexed citations
11.
Tälle, Malin, Jörgen Wissman, & Per Milberg. (2015). Gräsröjaren: ett skötselalternativ i artrika gräsmarker.. 108. 254–259.
12.
Milberg, Per, et al.. (2014). Har åtgärderna för att hjälpa mosippan varit effektiva? : Ett steg mot evidensbaserad naturvård i Sverige. 108(1). 26–33.3 indexed citations
13.
Milberg, Per & Karl‐Olof Bergman. (2014). Vårbränning är inte ett långsiktigt alternativ till bete eller slåtter av värdefulla artrika gräsmarker. 108(6). 312–322.2 indexed citations
14.
Milberg, Per & Karl‐Olof Bergman. (2010). Evidence-based conservation - a brief introduction [Evidensbaserad naturvård - Nytt begrepp och ny färdriktning?]. 104(1). 18–22.3 indexed citations
15.
Lisa, Antonella, et al.. (2004). Phenological changes within a growth season in two semi-natural pastures in southern Sweden. Annales Botanici Fennici. 41(1). 15–25.7 indexed citations
16.
Milberg, Per, et al.. (2002). Stratification responses in the late-germinating summer annual weed Erysimum cheiranthoides. 76. 172–175.3 indexed citations
17.
Milberg, Per, et al.. (2002). Management of semi-natural grassland vegetation : Evaluation of a long-term experiment in southern Sweden. Annales Botanici Fennici. 39(2). 159–166.74 indexed citations
18.
Milberg, Per, et al.. (1999). Species richness and distribution in relation to light in wooded meadows and pastures in southern Sweden. Annales Botanici Fennici. 36. 99–107.24 indexed citations
Milberg, Per. (1994). Annual dark dormancy cycle in buried seeds of Lychnis flos-cuculi. Annales Botanici Fennici. 31. 163–167.20 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.