Penny Xanthopoulou

569 total citations
28 papers, 370 citations indexed

About

Penny Xanthopoulou is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Clinical Psychology and Psychiatry and Mental health. According to data from OpenAlex, Penny Xanthopoulou has authored 28 papers receiving a total of 370 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 14 papers in General Health Professions, 10 papers in Clinical Psychology and 9 papers in Psychiatry and Mental health. Recurrent topics in Penny Xanthopoulou's work include Mental Health and Patient Involvement (6 papers), Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues (6 papers) and Schizophrenia research and treatment (6 papers). Penny Xanthopoulou is often cited by papers focused on Mental Health and Patient Involvement (6 papers), Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues (6 papers) and Schizophrenia research and treatment (6 papers). Penny Xanthopoulou collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Italy. Penny Xanthopoulou's co-authors include Rose McCabe, Ruth Garside, Gill Livingston, Jemima Dooley, Rosalind Raine, Susan Michie, Domenico Giacco, Isla Wallace, Martin Webber and Anne Lanceley and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Schizophrenia Research and Age and Ageing.

In The Last Decade

Penny Xanthopoulou

27 papers receiving 359 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Penny Xanthopoulou United Kingdom 10 173 131 83 81 79 28 370
Kristine Rørtveit Norway 11 116 0.7× 197 1.5× 69 0.8× 75 0.9× 43 0.5× 27 393
Debbie Peterson New Zealand 9 98 0.6× 91 0.7× 99 1.2× 30 0.4× 81 1.0× 22 323
Paul R. Falzer United States 9 254 1.5× 150 1.1× 70 0.8× 32 0.4× 87 1.1× 20 444
Catherine O’Driscoll Australia 10 156 0.9× 178 1.4× 113 1.4× 73 0.9× 185 2.3× 13 406
Patrick Triplett United States 8 84 0.5× 113 0.9× 32 0.4× 86 1.1× 68 0.9× 13 289
Rafey Faruqui United Kingdom 9 68 0.4× 212 1.6× 52 0.6× 36 0.4× 55 0.7× 31 413
Michael Kirshner United States 9 156 0.9× 118 0.9× 82 1.0× 46 0.6× 134 1.7× 14 421
Annette D. Boenink Netherlands 10 95 0.5× 43 0.3× 38 0.5× 163 2.0× 75 0.9× 21 388
Izabela E. Fedyszyn Australia 10 66 0.4× 273 2.1× 113 1.4× 34 0.4× 174 2.2× 11 487
Christiane Pinkert Germany 9 181 1.0× 96 0.7× 21 0.3× 117 1.4× 103 1.3× 20 335

Countries citing papers authored by Penny Xanthopoulou

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Penny Xanthopoulou's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Penny Xanthopoulou with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Penny Xanthopoulou more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Penny Xanthopoulou

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Penny Xanthopoulou. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Penny Xanthopoulou. The network helps show where Penny Xanthopoulou may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Penny Xanthopoulou

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Penny Xanthopoulou. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Penny Xanthopoulou based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Penny Xanthopoulou. Penny Xanthopoulou is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Ngamaba, Kayonda Hubert, et al.. (2023). Participation in leisure activities and quality of life of people with psychosis in England: a multi-site cross-sectional study. Annals of General Psychiatry. 22(1). 8–8. 5 indexed citations
2.
Xanthopoulou, Penny, et al.. (2022). Subjective experiences of the first response to mental health crises in the community: a qualitative systematic review. BMJ Open. 12(2). e055393–e055393. 9 indexed citations
3.
Xanthopoulou, Penny, et al.. (2022). Social Isolation and Psychosis: Perspectives from People with Psychosis, Family Caregivers and Mental Health Professionals. Community Mental Health Journal. 58(7). 1338–1345. 7 indexed citations
4.
Giacco, Domenico, Thomas Hamborg, Yan Feng, et al.. (2021). Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of a structured social coaching intervention for people with psychosis (SCENE): protocol for a randomised controlled trial. BMJ Open. 11(12). e050627–e050627. 9 indexed citations
5.
Giacco, Domenico, et al.. (2021). Neighbourhood characteristics and social isolation of people with psychosis: a multi-site cross-sectional study. Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology. 57(9). 1907–1915. 8 indexed citations
6.
Webber, Martin, et al.. (2021). Who wants more social contacts? A cross-sectional study of people with psychotic disorders in England. Schizophrenia Research. 240. 46–51. 7 indexed citations
7.
Priebe, Stefan, et al.. (2020). Helping people with psychosis to expand their social networks: the stakeholders’ views. BMC Psychiatry. 20(1). 29–29. 11 indexed citations
8.
Dooley, Jemima, Matthew Booker, Rebecca Barnes, & Penny Xanthopoulou. (2020). Urgent care for patients with dementia: a scoping review of associated factors and stakeholder experiences. BMJ Open. 10(9). e037673–e037673. 8 indexed citations
9.
Dooley, Jemima, et al.. (2020). Communication and understanding of mild cognitive impairment diagnoses. International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry. 35(6). 662–670. 8 indexed citations
10.
Xanthopoulou, Penny, et al.. (2020). Psychosocial Assessment in the Emergency Department: The Experiences of People Presenting with Self-Harm and Suicidality. SSRN Electronic Journal. 4 indexed citations
12.
Black, Georgia, Angus I. G. Ramsay, Abigail Baim‐Lance, et al.. (2019). What does it take to provide clinical interventions with temporal consistency? A qualitative study of London hyperacute stroke units. BMJ Open. 9(11). e025367–e025367. 6 indexed citations
14.
McCabe, Rose, et al.. (2018). Effectiveness of brief psychological interventions for suicidal presentations: a systematic review. BMC Psychiatry. 18(1). 120–120. 58 indexed citations
15.
Xanthopoulou, Penny, et al.. (2018). Patient and companion concerns when receiving a dementia diagnosis: an observational study of dementia diagnosis feedback meetings. Ageing and Society. 39(8). 1782–1805. 5 indexed citations
16.
McCabe, Rose, et al.. (2016). Effective communication in eliciting and responding to suicidal thoughts: a systematic review protocol. Systematic Reviews. 5(1). 31–31. 3 indexed citations
17.
Raine, Rosalind, Penny Xanthopoulou, Isla Wallace, et al.. (2015). Use of a formal consensus development technique to produce recommendations for improving the effectiveness of adult mental health multidisciplinary team meetings. BMC Psychiatry. 15(1). 143–143. 12 indexed citations
18.
Raine, Rosalind, Penny Xanthopoulou, Isla Wallace, et al.. (2014). Determinants of treatment plan implementation in multidisciplinary team meetings for patients with chronic diseases: a mixed-methods study. BMJ Quality & Safety. 23(10). 867–876. 46 indexed citations
19.
Hignett, Sue, Gina Sands, Mike Fray, et al.. (2013). Which bed designs and patient characteristics increase bed rail use?. Age and Ageing. 42(4). 531–535. 11 indexed citations
20.
Xanthopoulou, Penny. (2008). The social construction of emotion : a study of religious discursive practices. reroDoc Digital Library.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026