Pengfei Cheng
- Management Science and Operations Research top 2%
- Artificial Intelligence top 10%
- Control and Systems Engineering top 10%
- Strategy and Management
- Computational Theory and Mathematics top 10%
- Co-authors
- Jian‐qiang WangXiaokang WangHong‐gang PengYi-ting WangLin LiYongyi HeYusheng YangWenyan Liu
- Topics
- Multi-Criteria Decision Making (14 papers)Hydraulic and Pneumatic Systems (4 papers)Rough Sets and Fuzzy Logic (3 papers)
- Cited by
- Management Science and Operations ResearchStatistics and ProbabilityArtificial Intelligence
- Partner nations
- ChinaUnited KingdomSouth Korea
In The Last Decade
Pengfei Cheng
33 papers receiving 527 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 106
- Management Science and Operations Research 259
- Artificial Intelligence 144
- Control and Systems Engineering 85
- Strategy and Management 51
- Computational Theory and Mathematics 44
Countries citing papers authored by Pengfei Cheng
This map shows the geographic impact of Pengfei Cheng's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Pengfei Cheng with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Pengfei Cheng more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Pengfei Cheng
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Pengfei Cheng. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Pengfei Cheng. The network helps show where Pengfei Cheng may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Pengfei Cheng
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Pengfei Cheng. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Pengfei Cheng based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Pengfei Cheng. Pengfei Cheng is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 3 | |
| 2 | 2 | |
| 3 | 1 | |
| 4 | 0 | |
| 5 | 0 | |
| 6 | 10 | |
| 7 | 1 | |
| 8 | 35 | |
| 9 | 44 | |
| 10 | 14 | |
| 11 | 1 | |
| 12 | 33 | |
| 13 | 12 | |
| 14 | 10 | |
| 15 | 0 | |
| 16 | 1 | |
| 17 | 9 | |
| 18 | 8 | |
| 19 | 14 | |
| 20 | 10 |
About Pengfei Cheng
Pengfei Cheng is a scholar working on Management Science and Operations Research, Medical Laboratory Technology and Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality, having authored 38 papers that have together received 542 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Multi-Criteria Decision Making (14 papers), Hydraulic and Pneumatic Systems (4 papers) and Rough Sets and Fuzzy Logic (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Management Science and Operations Research (259 citations), Statistics and Probability (41 citations) and Artificial Intelligence (144 citations). Pengfei Cheng has collaborated with scholars based in China, United Kingdom and South Korea. Frequent co-authors include Jian‐qiang Wang, Xiaokang Wang, Hong‐gang Peng, Yi-ting Wang, Lin Li, Yongyi He, Yusheng Yang, Wenyan Liu, Zhou Zhi-qiang and Danping Li. Their work appears in journals such as PLoS ONE, Journal of Hazardous Materials and Scientific Reports.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.