Countries citing papers authored by Peer Zumbansen
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Peer Zumbansen's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Peer Zumbansen with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Peer Zumbansen more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Peer Zumbansen. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Peer Zumbansen. The network helps show where Peer Zumbansen may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Peer Zumbansen
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Peer Zumbansen.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Peer Zumbansen based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Peer Zumbansen. Peer Zumbansen is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Zumbansen, Peer, et al.. (2020). The New Geographies of Corporate Governance. University of Pennsylvania journal of international economic law. 42(1). 51–153.3 indexed citations
6.
Zumbansen, Peer. (2019). Transnational Law as Socio-Legal Theory and Critique: Prospects for “Law and Society” in a Divided World. Buffalo law review. 67(3). 909–960.1 indexed citations
7.
Zumbansen, Peer. (2019). Transnational Law as Socio-Legal Theory: The Challenges for “Law in Context” in a Divided World. SSRN Electronic Journal.1 indexed citations
8.
Zumbansen, Peer, et al.. (2019). Transnational Liability Regimes in Contract, Tort and Corporate Law: Comparative Observations on 'Global Supply Chain Liability'. SSRN Electronic Journal.1 indexed citations
9.
Zumbansen, Peer. (2017). ¿Cómo, dónde y para quién? Una interrogación a las formas, ubicuidades y propósitos del derecho. LA Referencia (Red Federada de Repositorios Institucionales de Publicaciones Científicas). 7(1). 420–440.
Zumbansen, Peer. (2013). What Lies Before, Behind and Beneath a Case? Five Minutes on Transnational Lawyering and the Consequences for Legal Education. eYLS (Yale Law School). 215–230.1 indexed citations
12.
Handl, Günther, et al.. (2012). Beyond Territoriality: Transnational Legal Authority in an Age of Globalization. eYLS (Yale Law School).6 indexed citations
13.
Zumbansen, Peer. (2012). Rethinking the Nature of the Firm: The Corporation as a Governance Object. Seattle University law review. 35(4). 1469.2 indexed citations
Zumbansen, Peer. (2008). Sustaining Paradox Boundaries: Perspectives on Internal Affairs in Domestic and International Law. SSRN Electronic Journal.1 indexed citations
17.
Zumbansen, Peer. (2005). Beyond Territoriality: The Case of Transnational Human Rights Litigation. eYLS (Yale Law School).3 indexed citations
18.
Zumbansen, Peer. (2004). European Corporate Law and National Divergences: The Case of Takeover Regulation. Open Scholarship Institutional Repository (Washington University in St. Louis). 3(3). 867–886.3 indexed citations
19.
Zumbansen, Peer. (2002). Zwangsarbeit im Dritten Reich : Erinnerung und Verantwortung : Juristische und zeithistorische Betrachtungen = NS-forced labor : remembrance and responsibility : legal and historical observations. Nomos eBooks.1 indexed citations
20.
Zumbansen, Peer, et al.. (2002). The Forgetfulness of Noblesse: A Critique of the German Foundation Law Compensating Slave and Forced Laborers of the Third Reich.6 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.