Paweł Czembor
- Plant Science top 5%
- Wheat and Barley Genetics and Pathology 30
- Plant Disease Resistance and Genetics 22
- Plant Pathogens and Resistance 8
- Agriculture, Plant Science, Crop Management 6
- Mycotoxins in Agriculture and Food 6
-
- Plant Pathogens and Fungal Diseases 8
- Agronomy and Crop Science top 10%
-
- Genetic Mapping and Diversity in Plants and Animals 7
-
- Yeasts and Rust Fungi Studies 10
- Co-authors
- E. ArseniukJens Grønbech HansenJulián Rodríguez-AlgabaTine ThachKerstin FlathAnnemarie Fejer JustesenMogens S. HovmøllerClaude de Vallavieille-Pope
In The Last Decade
Paweł Czembor
35 papers receiving 577 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 32
- Plant Science 585
- Cell Biology 100
- Agronomy and Crop Science 62
- Genetics 116
- Molecular Biology 171
Countries citing papers authored by Paweł Czembor
This map shows the geographic impact of Paweł Czembor's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Paweł Czembor with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Paweł Czembor more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Paweł Czembor
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Paweł Czembor. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Paweł Czembor. The network helps show where Paweł Czembor may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Paweł Czembor, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2025 | 0 | |
| 2 | 2024 | 1 | |
| 3 | 2023 | 3 | |
| 4 | 2022 | 4 | |
| 5 | 2022 | 36 | |
| 6 | 2021 | 3 | |
| 7 | 2021 | 13 | |
| 8 | 2021 | 7 | |
| 9 | 2020 | 10 | |
| 10 | 2019 | 18 | |
| 11 | 2018 | 5 | |
| 12 | 2010 | 20 | |
| 13 | 2007 | 1 | |
| 14 | 2007 | 3 | |
| 15 | 2005 | 1 | |
| 16 | 2004 | 27 | |
| 17 | 2003 | 46 | |
| 18 | 2003 | 17 | |
| 19 | 1999 | 27 | |
| 20 | Use of random amplified polymorphic DNA [RAPD] assay for differentiation among isolates of Stagonospora spp. and Septoria tritici | 1996 | 6 |
About Paweł Czembor
Paweł Czembor is a scholar working on Plant Science, Cell Biology and Genetics, having authored 37 papers that have together received 601 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Wheat and Barley Genetics and Pathology (30 papers), Plant Disease Resistance and Genetics (22 papers), Yeasts and Rust Fungi Studies (10 papers), Plant Pathogens and Resistance (8 papers), Plant Pathogens and Fungal Diseases (8 papers), Genetic Mapping and Diversity in Plants and Animals (7 papers), Agriculture, Plant Science, Crop Management (6 papers) and Mycotoxins in Agriculture and Food (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Plant Science (585 citations), Cell Biology (100 citations) and Agronomy and Crop Science (62 citations). Paweł Czembor has collaborated with scholars based in Poland, Australia and Germany. Frequent co-authors include E. Arseniuk, Jens Grønbech Hansen, Julián Rodríguez-Algaba, Tine Thach, Kerstin Flath, Annemarie Fejer Justesen, Mogens S. Hovmøller, Claude de Vallavieille-Pope, Amelia Hubbard and P. Lassen. Their work appears in journals such as International Journal of Molecular Sciences, Frontiers in Plant Science and BMC Plant Biology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.