Paulo Dinis
Impact in
- Urology top 0.2%
- Urinary Bladder and Prostate Research
- Rheumatology top 1%
- Pelvic floor disorders treatments
Papers in
- Urology 44
- Urinary Bladder and Prostate Research 41
- Rheumatology 26
- Pelvic floor disorders treatments 25
- Co-authors
- Francisco Cruz (37 shared papers)Carlos Silva (24 shared papers)João Silva (16 shared papers)Rui Pinto (21 shared papers)António Avelino (8 shared papers)Ana Charrua (6 shared papers)Daniel Engeler (9 shared papers)Sohier Elneil (10 shared papers)
- Journals
- European Urology (9 papers)British Journal of Urology (6 papers)The Journal of Urology (5 papers)European Urology Focus (3 papers)BMC Urology (3 papers)
- Partner nations
- PortugalUnited KingdomNetherlands
In The Last Decade
Paulo Dinis
64 papers receiving 1.5k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 85
- Urology 949
- Rheumatology 699
- Sensory Systems 182
- Neurology 194
- Psychiatry and Mental health 188
Countries citing papers authored by Paulo Dinis
This map shows the geographic impact of Paulo Dinis's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Paulo Dinis with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Paulo Dinis more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Paulo Dinis
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Paulo Dinis. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Paulo Dinis. The network helps show where Paulo Dinis may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Paulo Dinis, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 67 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2013 | 168 | |
| 2 | 2004 | 164 | |
| 3 | 2010 | 135 | |
| 4 | 2009 | 73 | |
| 5 | 2011 | 62 | |
| 6 | 2004 | 57 | |
| 7 | 2008 | 56 | |
| 8 | 2007 | 55 | |
| 9 | 2007 | 53 | |
| 10 | 2012 | 50 | |
| 11 | Guidelines on Chronic Pelvic Pain | 2012 | 48 |
| 12 | 2005 | 44 | |
| 13 | 2014 | 41 | |
| 14 | 2008 | 39 | |
| 15 | 2009 | 36 | |
| 16 | EAU Guidelines on chronic pelvic pain | 2015 | 34 |
| 17 | 2009 | 34 | |
| 18 | 2009 | 30 | |
| 19 | 2007 | 29 | |
| 20 | 2012 | 27 |
About Paulo Dinis
Paulo Dinis is a scholar working on Urology, Rheumatology, Surgery, Psychiatry and Mental health and Epidemiology, having authored 67 papers that have together received 1.5k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Urinary Bladder and Prostate Research (41 papers), Pelvic floor disorders treatments (25 papers), Sexual function and dysfunction studies (12 papers), Urinary Tract Infections Management (10 papers), Botulinum Toxin and Related Neurological Disorders (7 papers), Pain Mechanisms and Treatments (6 papers), Hormonal and reproductive studies (5 papers) and Prostate Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Urology (949 citations), Rheumatology (699 citations), Sensory Systems (182 citations), Neurology (194 citations) and Psychiatry and Mental health (188 citations). Paulo Dinis has collaborated with scholars based in Portugal, United Kingdom and Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include Francisco Cruz, Carlos Silva, João Silva, Rui Pinto, António Avelino, Ana Charrua, Daniel Engeler, Sohier Elneil, André Silva and I. Nagy. Their work appears in journals such as European Urology, British Journal of Urology, The Journal of Urology, European Urology Focus and BMC Urology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.