Paula Chesley
About
In The Last Decade
Paula Chesley
5 papers receiving 180 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 61
- Artificial Intelligence 135
- Language and Linguistics 32
- Information Systems 29
- Linguistics and Language 21
- Statistical and Nonlinear Physics 13
Countries citing papers authored by Paula Chesley
This map shows the geographic impact of Paula Chesley's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Paula Chesley with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Paula Chesley more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Paula Chesley
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Paula Chesley. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Paula Chesley. The network helps show where Paula Chesley may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Paula Chesley
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Paula Chesley. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Paula Chesley based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Paula Chesley. Paula Chesley is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 26 | |
| 2 | 7 | |
| 3 | 13 | |
| 4 | 22 | |
| 5 | Using Verbs and Adjectives to Automatically Classify Blog Sentiment. | 140 |
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.