Paul T. Conduit

2.1k total citations
22 papers, 1.4k citations indexed

About

Paul T. Conduit is a scholar working on Cell Biology, Molecular Biology and Plant Science. According to data from OpenAlex, Paul T. Conduit has authored 22 papers receiving a total of 1.4k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 20 papers in Cell Biology, 19 papers in Molecular Biology and 3 papers in Plant Science. Recurrent topics in Paul T. Conduit's work include Microtubule and mitosis dynamics (20 papers), Photosynthetic Processes and Mechanisms (7 papers) and Protist diversity and phylogeny (6 papers). Paul T. Conduit is often cited by papers focused on Microtubule and mitosis dynamics (20 papers), Photosynthetic Processes and Mechanisms (7 papers) and Protist diversity and phylogeny (6 papers). Paul T. Conduit collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, France and Austria. Paul T. Conduit's co-authors include Jordan W. Raff, Alan Wainman, Jeroen Dobbelaere, Zsofia A. Novak, Carly I. Dix, Steven Johnson, Eliana P. Lucas, Susan M. Lea, Zhe Feng and Jennifer H. Richens and has published in prestigious journals such as Cell, Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology and The Journal of Cell Biology.

In The Last Decade

Paul T. Conduit

21 papers receiving 1.4k citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Paul T. Conduit United Kingdom 14 1.1k 1.1k 212 188 55 22 1.4k
Alan Wainman United Kingdom 22 1.2k 1.1× 1.2k 1.0× 260 1.2× 251 1.3× 61 1.1× 33 1.6k
Isabelle Flückiger Switzerland 12 734 0.6× 735 0.6× 238 1.1× 161 0.9× 46 0.8× 15 910
Michelle Moritz United States 15 2.0k 1.7× 1.6k 1.4× 154 0.7× 207 1.1× 137 2.5× 19 2.2k
M. van Breugel United Kingdom 12 827 0.7× 819 0.7× 158 0.7× 219 1.2× 50 0.9× 16 969
James G. Wakefield United Kingdom 18 1.0k 0.9× 797 0.7× 92 0.4× 194 1.0× 92 1.7× 35 1.2k
Е. С. Надеждина Russia 19 977 0.9× 815 0.7× 95 0.4× 126 0.7× 80 1.5× 63 1.3k
Tomomi Kiyomitsu Japan 17 2.0k 1.8× 1.5k 1.3× 161 0.8× 642 3.4× 161 2.9× 21 2.4k
T S Hays United States 14 1.2k 1.1× 1.2k 1.0× 162 0.8× 238 1.3× 37 0.7× 17 1.5k
Swadhin Chandra Jana Portugal 16 889 0.8× 848 0.7× 326 1.5× 150 0.8× 163 3.0× 24 1.2k
Michel Paintrand France 8 1.2k 1.0× 1.1k 1.0× 263 1.2× 114 0.6× 110 2.0× 9 1.4k

Countries citing papers authored by Paul T. Conduit

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Paul T. Conduit's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Paul T. Conduit with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Paul T. Conduit more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Paul T. Conduit

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Paul T. Conduit. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Paul T. Conduit. The network helps show where Paul T. Conduit may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Paul T. Conduit

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Paul T. Conduit. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Paul T. Conduit based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Paul T. Conduit. Paul T. Conduit is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Conduit, Paul T., et al.. (2025). Asymmetric microtubule nucleation from Golgi stacks promotes opposite microtubule polarity in axons and dendrites. Current Biology. 35(6). 1311–1325.e4.
2.
Mukherjee, Amrita, et al.. (2024). γ-TuRCs and the augmin complex are required for the development of highly branched dendritic arbors in Drosophila. Journal of Cell Science. 137(9). 8 indexed citations
3.
Conduit, Paul T., et al.. (2024). Cryo-EM structures of γ-TuRC reveal molecular insights into microtubule nucleation. Nature Structural & Molecular Biology. 31(7). 1004–1006. 1 indexed citations
4.
Zhu, Zihan, et al.. (2023). Multifaceted modes of γ-tubulin complex recruitment and microtubule nucleation at mitotic centrosomes. The Journal of Cell Biology. 222(10). 8 indexed citations
5.
Cunningham, Neil, et al.. (2022). Daughter centrioles assemble preferentially towards the nuclear envelope in Drosophila syncytial embryos. Open Biology. 12(1). 210343–210343. 3 indexed citations
6.
Bernard, Fred, et al.. (2021). Autoinhibition of Cnn binding to γ-TuRCs prevents ectopic microtubule nucleation and cell division defects. The Journal of Cell Biology. 220(8). 16 indexed citations
7.
Mukherjee, Amrita, Paul Brooks, Fred Bernard, Antoine Guichet, & Paul T. Conduit. (2020). Microtubules originate asymmetrically at the somatic golgi and are guided via Kinesin2 to maintain polarity within neurons. eLife. 9. 30 indexed citations
8.
Mukherjee, Amrita & Paul T. Conduit. (2019). γ-TuRCs. Current Biology. 29(11). R398–R400. 3 indexed citations
9.
Zhu, Zihan, et al.. (2018). γ-TuRC Heterogeneity Revealed by Analysis of Mozart1. Current Biology. 28(14). 2314–2323.e6. 32 indexed citations
10.
Feng, Zhe, Anna Caballe, Alan Wainman, et al.. (2017). Structural Basis for Mitotic Centrosome Assembly in Flies. Cell. 169(6). 1078–1089.e13. 87 indexed citations
11.
Conduit, Paul T.. (2016). Microtubule organization: A complex solution. The Journal of Cell Biology. 213(6). 609–612. 3 indexed citations
12.
Conduit, Paul T., Daniel Hayward, & James G. Wakefield. (2015). Microinjection techniques for studying centrosome function in Drosophila melanogaster syncytial embryos. Methods in cell biology. 129. 229–249. 3 indexed citations
13.
Conduit, Paul T., Alan Wainman, & Jordan W. Raff. (2015). Centrosome function and assembly in animal cells. Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology. 16(10). 611–624. 377 indexed citations
14.
Conduit, Paul T., Alan Wainman, Zsofia A. Novak, Timothy T Weil, & Jordan W. Raff. (2015). Re-examining the role of Drosophila Sas-4 in centrosome assembly using two-colour-3D-SIM FRAP. eLife. 4. 30 indexed citations
15.
Conduit, Paul T., Zhe Feng, Jennifer H. Richens, et al.. (2014). The Centrosome-Specific Phosphorylation of Cnn by Polo/Plk1 Drives Cnn Scaffold Assembly and Centrosome Maturation. Developmental Cell. 28(6). 659–669. 126 indexed citations
16.
Novak, Zsofia A., Paul T. Conduit, Alan Wainman, & Jordan W. Raff. (2014). Asterless Licenses Daughter Centrioles to Duplicate for the First Time in Drosophila Embryos. Current Biology. 24(11). 1276–1282. 59 indexed citations
17.
Conduit, Paul T., Jennifer H. Richens, Alan Wainman, et al.. (2014). A molecular mechanism of mitotic centrosome assembly in Drosophila. eLife. 3. e03399–e03399. 91 indexed citations
18.
Conduit, Paul T., et al.. (2010). Centrioles Regulate Centrosome Size by Controlling the Rate of Cnn Incorporation into the PCM. Current Biology. 20(24). 2178–2186. 131 indexed citations
19.
Conduit, Paul T. & Jordan W. Raff. (2010). Cnn Dynamics Drive Centrosome Size Asymmetry to Ensure Daughter Centriole Retention in Drosophila Neuroblasts. Current Biology. 20(24). 2187–2192. 128 indexed citations
20.
Li, Sam, Alan M. Sandercock, Paul T. Conduit, et al.. (2006). Structural role of Sfi1p–centrin filaments in budding yeast spindle pole body duplication. The Journal of Cell Biology. 173(6). 867–877. 112 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Alan Wainman Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Isabelle Flückiger Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Michelle Moritz Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by M. van Breugel Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by James G. Wakefield Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Е. С. Надеждина Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Tomomi Kiyomitsu Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by T S Hays Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Swadhin Chandra Jana Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Michel Paintrand
Rankless by CCL
2026