Paul Schilder

4.5k citations
12 papers · 226 · h-index 5

Impact in

Papers in

Paul Schilder

8 papers receiving 189 citations

Peers

Paul Schilder
Comparison fields: 5 of 75
  • Clinical Psychology 95
  • Pharmacy 15
  • Human-Computer Interaction 15
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 34
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 40
Replace Kamila Irvine with:
Kamila Irvine United Kingdom
Sandra A. Birtchnell United Kingdom
Helena Grönqvist Sweden
Masune Sukigara Japan
Claire Ducro Belgium
Anika Bauer Germany
Matthew Schrock United States
Megan M. Brown United States
Rachel M. Butler United States
Yolanda Álvarez‐Pérez Spain
Paul Schilder relative to Kamila Irvine United Kingdom Kamila Irvine's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Kamila Irvine · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Paul Schilder

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Paul Schilder's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Paul Schilder with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Paul Schilder more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Paul Schilder

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Paul Schilder. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Paul Schilder. The network helps show where Paul Schilder may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 9 scholars most cited alongside Paul Schilder, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Paul Schilder Line = papers co-authored together Paul Schilder links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

12 of 12 papers shown
#Work
1 2013187
2
L'image du corps : étude des forces constructives de la psyché
196815
3 19528
4
Imagen y apariencia del cuerpo humano: estudios sobre las energías constructivas de la psique
19837
5 19525
6 20192
7 20081
8 19571
9 20070
10 20080
11 20080
12 20130

About Paul Schilder

Paul Schilder is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, Nature and Landscape Conservation, Social Psychology, Cognitive Neuroscience and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, having authored 12 papers that have together received 226 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Diet and metabolism studies (1 paper), Advanced Optical Network Technologies (1 paper), Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments (1 paper), Advanced Photonic Communication Systems (1 paper), Optical Network Technologies (1 paper), Educational theories and practices (1 paper), Psychological Treatments and Disorders (1 paper) and Ecology, Conservation, and Geographical Studies (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Clinical Psychology (95 citations), Pharmacy (15 citations), Human-Computer Interaction (15 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (34 citations) and Cognitive Neuroscience (40 citations). Paul Schilder has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Germany. Frequent co-authors include O. Hobart Mowrer, Samuel M. Strong, Matthias Gunkel, Hans Hoff, Andreas Poppe, Roy M. Dorcus, F. L. Marcuse, Lauretta Bender and Momtchil Peev. Their work appears in journals such as American Sociological Review, Stereotactic and Functional Neurosurgery, The American Journal of Psychology, Monatsschrift für Psychiatrie und Neurologie and Gallimard eBooks.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact