Paul Pichler
- Biophysics top 2%
- Physiology top 5%
-
- Monetary Policy and Economic Impact 11
- Economic Theory and Policy 3
- Developmental Biology top 10%
- Finance top 10%
- Global Financial Crisis and Policies 3
-
- Economic theories and models 9
- Fiscal Policies and Political Economy 4
- Economic Policies and Impacts 2
-
- Hearing, Cochlea, Tinnitus, Genetics 3
-
- Marine animal studies overview 2
- Co-authors
- Leon LagnadoStefan NiemannMartin SaundersDavid A. KeaysNathaniel B. EdelmanJeremy ShawMarion Claudia SalzerGerhard Sorger
- Partner nations
- AustriaUnited KingdomAustralia
In The Last Decade
Paul Pichler
23 papers receiving 445 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 100
- Biophysics 116
- Physiology 70
- General Economics, Econometrics and Finance 107
- Developmental Biology 27
- Finance 51
Countries citing papers authored by Paul Pichler
This map shows the geographic impact of Paul Pichler's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Paul Pichler with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Paul Pichler more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Paul Pichler
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Paul Pichler. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Paul Pichler. The network helps show where Paul Pichler may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Paul Pichler, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2023 | 6 | |
| 2 | Does digitalization require Central Bank Digital Currencies for the general public | 2020 | 4 |
| 3 | 2020 | 4 | |
| 4 | 2020 | 1 | |
| 5 | 2019 | 31 | |
| 6 | Do We Need Central Bank Digital Currency? Economics, Technology and Institutions | 2018 | 6 |
| 7 | 2018 | 20 | |
| 8 | 2017 | 2 | |
| 9 | 2016 | 7 | |
| 10 | 2014 | 54 | |
| 11 | 2013 | 38 | |
| 12 | 2013 | 16 | |
| 13 | 2012 | 128 | |
| 14 | 2011 | 10 | |
| 15 | 2011 | 33 | |
| 16 | 2010 | 17 | |
| 17 | 2010 | 41 | |
| 18 | 2010 | 8 | |
| 19 | 2008 | 13 | |
| 20 | Evaluating Approximate Equilibria of Dynamic Economic Models | 2005 | 3 |
About Paul Pichler
Paul Pichler is a scholar working on General Economics, Econometrics and Finance, Sensory Systems and Economics and Econometrics, having authored 23 papers that have together received 468 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Monetary Policy and Economic Impact (11 papers), Economic theories and models (9 papers), Fiscal Policies and Political Economy (4 papers), Hearing, Cochlea, Tinnitus, Genetics (3 papers), Global Financial Crisis and Policies (3 papers), Economic Theory and Policy (3 papers), Marine animal studies overview (2 papers) and Economic Policies and Impacts (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Biophysics (116 citations), Physiology (70 citations) and General Economics, Econometrics and Finance (107 citations). Paul Pichler has collaborated with scholars based in Austria, United Kingdom and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Leon Lagnado, Stefan Niemann, Martin Saunders, David A. Keays, Nathaniel B. Edelman, Jeremy Shaw, Marion Claudia Salzer, Gerhard Sorger, Mark F. Lythgoe and Maarten Janssen.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.