Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Low‐frequency magnetic field measurements near the epicenter of the Ms 7.1 Loma Prieta Earthquake
This map shows the geographic impact of Paul McGill's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Paul McGill with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Paul McGill more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Paul McGill. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Paul McGill. The network helps show where Paul McGill may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Paul McGill
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Paul McGill.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Paul McGill based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Paul McGill. Paul McGill is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Henthorn, R., et al.. (2009). Development of a High-Resolution Shallow Seismic Refraction Tomography System at the Monterey Bay Aquarium Research Institute. AGU Fall Meeting Abstracts. 2009.1 indexed citations
Weekly, R. T., William S. D. Wilcock, D. R. Toomey, E. E. Hooft, & Paul McGill. (2008). An Automatically Generated Earthquake Catalog for the Endeavour Segment of the Juan de Fuca Ridge: Linkages Between Segment and Vent-Field Scale Seismicity. AGU Fall Meeting Abstracts. 2008.2 indexed citations
9.
Wilcock, William S. D., et al.. (2007). Microearthquakes Beneath the Endeavour Hydrothermal Vent Fields: Insights Into Reaction Zone Processes. AGU Fall Meeting Abstracts. 2007.1 indexed citations
McGill, Paul, et al.. (2004). First Results From the Deployment of a Buried Broadband Seismometer on the Endeavour Segment of the Juan de Fuca Ridge. AGUFM. 2004.2 indexed citations
12.
Wilcock, William S. D., Paul McGill, Debra S. Stakes, et al.. (2004). Local Earthquakes on the Endeavour Segment of the Juan de Fuca Ridge: First Seismic Results from the Keck Seismic/Hydrothermal Observatory. AGU Fall Meeting Abstracts. 2004.4 indexed citations
13.
Uhrhammer, R. A., D. Dolenc, Barbara Romanowicz, et al.. (2003). MOBB: Data Analysis from an Ocean Floor Broadband Seismic Observatory. AGUFM. 2003.3 indexed citations
14.
McGill, Paul, et al.. (2003). A Long-Term Seismic Array on the Endeavour Segment of the Juan de Fuca Ridge. AGU Fall Meeting Abstracts. 2003.3 indexed citations
15.
McGill, Paul, et al.. (2002). Deployment of a Long-Term Broadband Seafloor Observatory in Monterey Bay. AGU Fall Meeting Abstracts. 2002.5 indexed citations
16.
Uhrhammer, R. A., et al.. (2002). Instrument Testing and First Results From the MOBB Observatory. AGUFM. 2002.5 indexed citations
17.
McGill, Paul, et al.. (2002). Multiple GPS RFI Sources in a Small California Harbor. Proceedings of the 15th International Technical Meeting of the Satellite Division of The Institute of Navigation (ION GPS 2002). 605–612.2 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.